Contractors Can Use RFI to Notify the Government
The Board (and the government) should not elevate form over substance in evaluating the sufficiency of a contractor’s notice.
The Board (and the government) should not elevate form over substance in evaluating the sufficiency of a contractor’s notice.
The law is not a trend-setter. It doesn’t readily change or adapt to tech. So, a commonplace practice in business became a dispute when a claimant digitally certified a claim under the Contract Disputes Act.
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a […]
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
Contractors take heed – a time extension may be issued […]
Contract formation confirms the parties understand and agree to all […]
When you know a current action or inaction is wrong, but you do not object, should you be allowed to object later?
Construction project professionals routinely send e-mails with “signatures,” which typically include the sender’s typewritten name, title, contact information, and/or company logo. But, this sort of e-mail “signature” is not enough to certify a claim to the Government.