What to do if your contract lacks the parts to handle COVID-19? Considerations for creating new contracts during COVID-19.
The Board (and the government) should not elevate form over substance in evaluating the sufficiency of a contractor’s notice.
Ever had buyer’s remorse or second-guessed a decision? When the […]
A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor.
When Massachusetts’ highest State court rejected Federal law on termination […]
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a […]
- Government Construction Contracts Require Bonds, Even When Contract Doesn’t Say So GalleryAmbiguity, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), Contract Interpretation, Court of Federal Claims, Government Contract, Terms and Conditions
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
The Government’s negligent estimate failed to provide the “most current information available.”