I promise that any disputes between us will be argued at your house. Time passes and a dispute begins to brew. Now, I want to argue at my house, not at yours. You pay costs to argue at my house that you wouldn’t have incurred had I done as agreed. Should I have to reimburse your costs?
A Federal Court in Northern California said yes – I have to pay your costs because I broke my promise.
During a project for the U.S. Navy in Djibouti for electrical and mechanical power-plant upgrades, a Subcontractor agreed that any disputes between it and the Prime Contractor would be resolved in a California Federal Court. The Prime is a U.S. company with its headquarters in California. The Sub is a Lebanese company with no regular presence in the U.S. In fact, it appears the Sub has never been to the U.S.
Recap: The dispute has nothing to do with anything near your headquarters/office/house, the Project is nowhere near your office, I’ve never been near your office, it’s probably more convenient for you to argue near your office, which is why you included this term in the Subcontract, and (most importantly) I agreed to only argue near your office.
Result: The argument will be near your office, not mine and not near the Project where we both worked and lived for many months. And, I now have pay your costs incurred because I tried to argue with you near the Project.
Keep a Pass-Thru Claim Burning, Don’t Extinguish Liability
Prime contractors, have you ever submitted a subcontractor’s claim to a public owner? Subcontractors, have you ever wanted to submit a claim against the government, but you had no contract with government?
When You Can’t Recover from a Third-Party (The Economic Loss Doctrine)
Suppose that you (the Contractor) had extra costs and want payment for those extra costs from the designer.
Barbecue and Construction Contracts
While barbecue recipes can be short and simple, contracts can be long and complicated. Fundamentally, though, recipes are very much like contracts: what’s required, how much of each part/ingredient, in what order should they be assembled/added, when, and for how long?
Show Your Work
A mentor of mine once said that process and procedures can be more important than substance and results. Like solving a math problem, how you solve it is often more important than the answer itself. The same is true in resolving construction contract disputes with public owners.
Substandard is Not Defective
The government need not follow the industry standard. It can do less or more.
Hide, Seek, & Seek
Have you ever played hide and seek? If you are the seeker, do you win the game when you find the hidden person? Yes, of course! Unless, you’re a government contractor.
Contractor Schooled School
Have you ever done exactly what you were supposed to do, but it didn’t work and you were blamed anyway? Nevertheless, if contractors follow the owner’s plans and it still doesn’t work, the contractor may be without fault – this is as it should be.
Walk It Off, Keep Going
During a recent soccer game, my seven-year-old son took the ball squarely in the face. But, he walked it off and continued playing. Contractors must do the same with changes.
Are We There Yet?
Next time you close a deal, get the essential terms on paper and signed by all parties before it’s Miller Time.
