WHAT COUNTS AS A CONTRACT DOCUMENT
A recent decision clarifies how attachments and background reports can fall outside the contract

A DOCUMENT for informational purposes only may not support a differing site condition claim and definitions matter. A recent case decided by the Minnesota Court of Appeals offers a cautionary tale for contractors, engineers and municipalities alike. Ames Construction Inc. v. City of Moorhead, Case No. A25-0754, 2026 WL 861199 (March 30, 2026). Continue reading

Published On: June 9, 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan Straw: Editor

July 2, 2026|

CLOSING THE LOOPHOLE: ARIZONA ADDS PROMPT PAY PROTECTIONS TO REVITALIZATION DISTRICTS

Arizona contractors operating in public and quasi-public sectors sometimes rely on Prompt […]

  • Roads & Bridges | Jonathan Straw

Roads & Bridges | Caught in the Middle

August 26, 2025|

CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE
New Mexico bridge case highlights the importance of written agreements for changes and delay compensation

In construction contracting, hope for […]

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan J. Straw
Best Lawyers® - Jonathan Straw | 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!