Recently, I posted about the Spearin Doctrine, which says that if a contractor follows the owner’s plans and specifications and something doesn’t work, the contractor is generally not at fault. But, this only works if the contractor first follows the owner’s design. It doesn’t work when the owner’s design will work as is, but you think it could be better.
In recently denying an HVAC Contractor’s appeal, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals stated, “the government may require performance [either] in excess of, or below, the standard normally accepted in a trade.” In other words, the government need not follow the industry standard. It can do less or more.
Under a firm, fixed-price contract managed by the Army Corps of Engineers, the Contractor agreed to upgrade the HVAC equipment at a Child Development Center at a facility in Hanover, NH. The project was “limited by budget constraints,” but included work intended to remedy the “thermal discomfort” of the facility’s occupants.
The Contractor advised the Corps that certain design improvements would help the end-user. The Corps considered the advice, but rejected the Contractor’s suggestion. Thereafter, the Contractor “delayed the project because it disagreed with the government’s design choices.” Ultimately, the Corps terminated the Contractor for default.
Roads & Bridges | Award Upheld in W. Va. Caisson Dispute
AWARD UPHELD IN W.VA. CAISSON DISPUTE
Federal court reinforces high bar for overturning arbitration
In 2018, the West Virginia Department of Highways (DOH) awarded […]
Roads & Bridges |Let the Contract Lead
LET THE CONTRACT LEAD
Documents offer guidance needed to manage risk without derailing projects
Construction is an industry of managed risk. Whether the prices […]
Roads & Bridges | When is an Invoice Really an Invoice?
WHEN IS AN INVOICE REALLY AN INVOICE?
All court decisions are opinions. Appellate court decisions are typically made by a panel of three […]
Roads & Bridges | Clarifying Punitive Damages
CLARIFYING PUNITIVE DAMAGES
In June 2021, the South Dakota Department of Transportation contracted for the demolition and construction of a bridge on State […]
Roads & Bridges | When Approximate Means Assumed Risk
WHEN APPROXIMATE MEANS ASSUMED RISK
A New York Court Shows How Performance Specifications Can Leave Contractors Holding the Bag
Sometimes when we are told […]
Roads & Bridges | From Roman Arches to AI
FROM ROMAN ARCHES TO AI
Can Construction Evolve Without Risk?
The construction industry blends old with new. From ancient Roman archways and aqueducts and […]
Roads & Bridges | Caught in the Middle
CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE
New Mexico bridge case highlights the importance of written agreements for changes and delay compensation
In construction contracting, hope for […]
Roads & Bridges | Wait and It’s Waived
WAIT AND IT’S WAIVED
Roads & Bridges | Supreme Court Ruling on Arbitration Delay
Don’t wait to arbitrate! Progressing too far down the litigation […]
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
BIDDING BLUNDER
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
For over 125 years, the vast majority of jurisdictions […]
