When Massachusetts’ highest State court rejected Federal law on termination for convenience (T4C) a public entity’s “sole discretion . . . for any reason” ended a supplier’s contract.  Is this too much governmental power or good stewardship of public resources?

Under a public contract, a Supplier agreed to provide fuel to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.  About eleven months into the two-year contract, the Authority terminated the contract because it could get the same fuel for a cheaper price from a different supplier.

Upon 30-days written notice, termination by the Authority was within its “sole discretion . . . for any reason.”  The terminated party was expressly entitled to payment for: demobilization, contract closeout, and costs of and profit on work performed.

The Massachusetts State Supreme Judicial Court held the termination was proper and made several points:

  1. Federal law on termination for convenience was not binding on the Commonwealth;
  2. General principles of contract interpretation under State law applied;
  3. The termination language was unambiguous and broad; and
  4. The requirement for pre-termination written notice was enough consideration for a contract.

The Court expressly stated it was not deciding whether a T4C would be proper to rebid the contract in search of a lower price.  But, the roadmap of this decision would make it easy for a Court to find even such a T4C was OK.

A. L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 479 Mass. 419 (May 2, 2018).

Published On: November 27, 2018

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters

October 17, 2023|

CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity

What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]

  • Sum Certain Blog Post

Jurisdiction is Power

August 27, 2023|

Not bad power, but the ability of a decision-maker (e.g., court) to decide which side is right (or which is more correct). […]

  • A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity

Roads & Bridges | Mediation Melee

June 13, 2023|

MEDIATION MELEE| An arbitration case can be costly

Arbitration can be a bridge over troubled waters. In this crossing, the parties argued over […]

  • Written Notice | Roads & Bridges Article | Jon Straw

Roads & Bridges | Written Notice

April 2, 2023|

WRITTEN NOTICE | Beware that strict compliance of the contract might be required.

When an owner replaced a contractor for significant safety violations, […]

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!