A limitations period is too short when it’s unreasonably short.

Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the Maryland District Court upholding a one-year contractual limitations period for arbitration.  Along with a separate contractual waiver any trial in a traditional court setting, the plaintiff was SOL when he didn’t demand arbitration within one year. 

The Court reaffirmed its prior holding from a separate 2007 case that, generally, “limitations periods may be shortened by agreement, so long as the limitations period is not unreasonably short.”  Absent the agreement, the plaintiff had three years to file a lawsuit for breach of contract.

See also: When typical limitations don’t apply.

Read, re-read, review, and thoroughly understand your contracts.  It’s often better to reasonably act and be rejected than not act or be too late.

Bracey v. Lancaster Foods LLC, No. 19-1292 (4th Cir. Dec. 16, 2020)

Published On: January 25, 2021

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Adding Terms to a Government Contract without Saying So

March 14, 2018|

Imagine an incredulous Contractor asking, “Show me in the Contract where it says I’m supposed to do X?”  The Government Contracting Officer smugly answers, “even though the Contract doesn’t say so, you must do it anyway.”  Is that even possible, when, how?

Forum Selection Can Be a Home-Court Advantage

March 1, 2018|

I promise that any disputes between us will be argued at your house.  Time passes and a dispute begins to brew.  Now, I want to argue at my house, not at yours.  You pay costs to argue at my house that you wouldn’t have incurred had I done as agreed.  Should I have to reimburse your costs?

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan J. Straw
Best Lawyers® - Jonathan Straw | 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!