Since Y2K, sureties for federal projects in Virginia have been unable to defend against bond lawsuits by asserting pay-if-paid or pay-when paid clauses.  Now, sureties are also unable to rely upon no-damage-for-delay (ND4D) and owner-related disputes clauses.

Recently, the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that a Prime’s Surety could not use the ND4D clause to defend against a Sub’s Miller Act lawsuit.  Neither was the Sub required to wait until resolution of delays that the Owner may have caused, despite an express subcontract provision requiring as much.

The Court held that “the subcontract cannot eliminate the right to payment altogether, or delay it, unless the subcontract does so in a manner consistent with the terms of the Miller Act.”  The only consistent means of which this author knows, and which the Court endorsed, were interim payment waivers for work already performed.  The Court likened ND4D clauses to prospective waivers, which the Court said are prohibited by the Miller Act (although no such language exists in the Act).

U.S. f/u/b/o Kitchens To Go v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc., Case No. 1:16-cv-991 (U.S.D.C., E.D. Va., October 19, 2017)

Published On: February 22, 2018

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages

February 24, 2024|

LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable

Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.

In June 2017, […]

  • Roads & Bridges | Warranty Provisions

Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions

January 25, 2024|

WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results

You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]

Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters

October 17, 2023|

CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity

What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]

  • Sum Certain Blog Post

Jurisdiction is Power

August 27, 2023|

Not bad power, but the ability of a decision-maker (e.g., court) to decide which side is right (or which is more correct). […]

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!