Here’s the situation – You’ve done the extra work because you were verbally asked and you strive to do a good job. But now, the Owner or Prime won’t pay because your Contract or Subcontract precludes payment without a written change order.
Even if your agreement can only be modified by a writing, you may still have a good argument to be paid for extra work.
Consider your prior dealings with the Owner or Prime on the current project and on prior projects. Have you ever been paid for extra work without a written change order? If yes, then you could still get paid even though the contract requires a written change order or other written agreement. The more frequently this happens between you and the other party, the better your chances of payment.
The Virginia Supreme Court has held a subcontract clause requiring a written agreement for changes did not pertain to work outside the scope of the original subcontract. Instead, the Subcontractor’s invoices were sufficient written documentation to show subsequent, separate agreements for the extra work. The Subcontractor’s daily reports supported that the Subcontractor actually performed the extra work. Also important is that the subcontract did not include a provision that excluded all other negotiations from the Subcontract (i.e., a merger or integration clause).
Medlin & Son Construction Co. v. The Matthews Group, Inc., No. 160050 (Va. Nov. 23, 2016)
Virginia General Contractors Not Protected from Pre-Work Claim Waivers
On March 2, 2018, the Governor approved an act of the Virginia General Assembly to make unenforceable pre-work waivers of lien rights […]
Adding Terms to a Government Contract without Saying So
Imagine an incredulous Contractor asking, “Show me in the Contract where it says I’m supposed to do X?” The Government Contracting Officer smugly answers, “even though the Contract doesn’t say so, you must do it anyway.” Is that even possible, when, how?
Differing Site Conditions: When the Part Does Not Equal the Whole
If all apples are fruit, then why are all fruit not apples?
Forum Selection Can Be a Home-Court Advantage
I promise that any disputes between us will be argued at your house. Time passes and a dispute begins to brew. Now, I want to argue at my house, not at yours. You pay costs to argue at my house that you wouldn’t have incurred had I done as agreed. Should I have to reimburse your costs?
No-Damage-for-Delay and Owner-Related Dispute Clauses are No Defense to Surety Liability Under Miller Act
Prime Government Contractors - you may need to update your interim payment waivers.
Contractual Fairness is Whatever the Parties’ Agreed
When you know a current action or inaction is wrong, but you do not object, should you be allowed to object later?
Which Comes First – Specifications or Drawings?
Sometimes it's not better to ask for forgiveness after-the-fact.
Government Contract Claims: When Appeal is Rejection of Settlement
Without a reservation of rights, appealing a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision is a rejection of any offer of payment or settlement included therein. So, the contractor had only three options.
Linking Obligations
If you want to bind the subcontractor to the prime in every way the same as the prime is bound to the owner, then the incorporation clause of the subcontract should be: . . .
