CLOSING THE LOOPHOLE: ARIZONA ADDS PROMPT PAY PROTECTIONS TO REVITALIZATION DISTRICTS
Arizona contractors operating in public and quasi-public sectors sometimes rely on Prompt Pay statutes to help maintain cash flow. However, a statutory loophole created risk for civil and infrastructure contractors when working for Revitalization Districts—special taxing entities utilized by municipalities to help finance roads, utilities, drainage systems, and other public infrastructure needs.
When Revitalization Districts faced internal funding delays or bureaucratic standstills, contractors could find themselves stuck between slow or no payment and having to self-finance and continue performance, under the threat of default or claims from higher tiers. That risk was significantly reduced on June 22, 2026, when the Governor signed Senate Bill 1189 into law. Protections of Arizona Prompt Pay Statutes are now available for Revitalization District projects.
Prime contractors now have statutory rights to suspend or entirely terminate work if a Revitalization District fails to issue timely payments, provided the contractor delivers a formal seven-day written notice. Subcontractors receive parallel protections, also with required written notice. This added protection does not necessarily trump your contract requirements, which may still be enforceable depending on your situation.
Also under these statutory changes, contractors cannot be deemed in breach of contract for executing a lawful work stoppage. There is also a provision allowing a prevailing party to recover attorneys fees for successful enforcement.
Moving forward, contractors bidding on Arizona infrastructure projects funded by local taxing districts can proceed knowing that their right to timely payment is now better protected.
How to Find (and Confirm) the Plain Meaning in a Contract
Contract formation confirms the parties understand and agree to all the essential terms. When that understanding and agreement fades, how do you […]
Navigating the Requirements for Claims against Virginia Public Entities
Contractors making claims against Virginia public entities must follow ALL applicable requirements. Such requirements may be found in several places, so check […]
Virginia General Contractors Not Protected from Pre-Work Claim Waivers
On March 2, 2018, the Governor approved an act of the Virginia General Assembly to make unenforceable pre-work waivers of lien rights […]
Adding Terms to a Government Contract without Saying So
Imagine an incredulous Contractor asking, “Show me in the Contract where it says I’m supposed to do X?” The Government Contracting Officer smugly answers, “even though the Contract doesn’t say so, you must do it anyway.” Is that even possible, when, how?
Differing Site Conditions: When the Part Does Not Equal the Whole
If all apples are fruit, then why are all fruit not apples?
Forum Selection Can Be a Home-Court Advantage
I promise that any disputes between us will be argued at your house. Time passes and a dispute begins to brew. Now, I want to argue at my house, not at yours. You pay costs to argue at my house that you wouldn’t have incurred had I done as agreed. Should I have to reimburse your costs?
No-Damage-for-Delay and Owner-Related Dispute Clauses are No Defense to Surety Liability Under Miller Act
Prime Government Contractors - you may need to update your interim payment waivers.
Contractual Fairness is Whatever the Parties’ Agreed
When you know a current action or inaction is wrong, but you do not object, should you be allowed to object later?
Which Comes First – Specifications or Drawings?
Sometimes it's not better to ask for forgiveness after-the-fact.
