As of Jan. 1, 2023, pay-if-paid clauses are unenforceable, regardless of whether a surety/payment bond claim is involved.  This is only for subcontracts created on/after 1/1/23.

Also for subcontracts created on/after 1/1/23, the prime must specifically identify and notify the sub of withholding as underlined below.

Per Va Code 11-4.6(C), for any withholding, the prime “shall notify the subcontractor, in writing, of his intention to withhold all or a part of the subcontractor’s payment with the reason for nonpayment, specifically identifying the contractual noncompliance, the dollar amount being withheld, and the lower-tier subcontractor responsible for the contractual noncompliance.”

Per Va Code 2.2-4354(1), (SB 550) Requires construction contracts awarded by state or local government agencies “as well as certain private construction contracts in which there is at least one general contractor and one subcontractor” to include a payment clause that obligates the contractors to be liable for the entire amount owed to any subcontractor with which it contracts. The bill provides that “a contractor shall not be liable for amounts otherwise reducible due to the subcontractor’s noncompliance with the terms of the contract; however, the contractor must notify the subcontractor in writing of the contractor’s intent to withhold all or a part of the subcontractor’s payment with the reason for such nonpayment.”

The legislature has not yet, but is working, to reconcile the specificity required by one code section that the other section more broadly outlines.

 

Published On: January 31, 2023

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Adding Terms to a Government Contract without Saying So

March 14, 2018|

Imagine an incredulous Contractor asking, “Show me in the Contract where it says I’m supposed to do X?”  The Government Contracting Officer smugly answers, “even though the Contract doesn’t say so, you must do it anyway.”  Is that even possible, when, how?

Forum Selection Can Be a Home-Court Advantage

March 1, 2018|

I promise that any disputes between us will be argued at your house.  Time passes and a dispute begins to brew.  Now, I want to argue at my house, not at yours.  You pay costs to argue at my house that you wouldn’t have incurred had I done as agreed.  Should I have to reimburse your costs?

Linking Obligations

January 24, 2018|

If you want to bind the subcontractor to the prime in every way the same as the prime is bound to the owner, then the incorporation clause of the subcontract should be: . . .

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan J. Straw
Best Lawyers® - Jonathan Straw | 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!