Another post discussed that your existing contract can probably handle the risks related to COVID-19. But, what to do if you contract lacks the support to handle COVID-19 and what to consider when creating new contracts during COVID-19?
What if the contract does not have a force majeure or other relief clause? First, consider the language of any applicable changes clause. Second, review any governmental emergency relief acts that could help. Third, the common law doctrine of frustration may be available, under which an obligation may excused or discharged when a fundamental assumption of the contract is not true or something later occurs rendering performance physically impossible or commercially impracticable. However, a radical price increase alone is likely insufficient.
When creating new contracts during COVID-19, do not rely solely upon force majeure clauses. Because unforeseeability is an element of most clauses, parties contracting during an event will find it very difficult to argue they could not contemplate the potential impact of the event. Consider including or adapting a price acceleration provision to prescribe or liquidate relief.
Acceptance and Intervening Cause Avoided Construction Warranty Claim
Like cars, computers, and appliances, construction projects include warranties too. Similarly, construction project warranties are limited to causes within the contractor’s control […]
Insurance Company Had No Duty to Defend Under Eight Corners Rule
To decide if an insurer has a duty to defend, a Virginia State or Federal Court may only look at the allegations in the complaint and the insurance policy to determine if a judgment against the insured will be covered by the policy.
Owner SOL When Mandatory Mediation Didn’t Toll Statute of Limitations
Contract interpretation strives to find the meaning of all parts together.
Government Must Review Claims in Good Faith, Not “Conjure Up” a “Baseless Retaliation”
A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor.
Termination for Convenience was OK to Get a Lower Price
When Massachusetts’ highest State court rejected Federal law on termination for convenience (T4C) a public entity’s “sole discretion . . . for […]
Pirates (Parties) Should Arbitrate Arbitrability
Yes, the word “pirates” is an anagram for “parties.” Participants in a lawsuit, arbitration, or mediation are collectively referred to as parties. Are they pirates too?
Very Bad Behavior Without Bad Faith is Not a Breach of Contract
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a majority of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held there was […]
Government Construction Contracts Require Bonds, Even When Contract Doesn’t Say So
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
Government’s Negligent Estimate a Trick?
The Government’s negligent estimate failed to provide the “most current information available.”
