You’ve heard, “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” In this instance, the smoke was concrete dust that damaged a warehouse full of aircraft parts. No fire was necessary.
An Owner of an aircraft parts distribution facility hired a Contractor to install an elevator at Owner’s warehouse in Fredericksburg, Virginia. The installation required an elevator pit to be cut through several inches of existing concrete. The Contractor used jack hammers and concrete saws without water, which created a significant cloud of dust and particles. The dust cloud settled on and damaged the aircraft parts inventory stored nearby.
Owner’s Insurer argued dust and particulates were excluded from coverage under the Pollution Exclusion pertaining to “any solid . . . irritant or contaminant.” Owner argued that dust and particulates were “smoke,” which was covered under the policy regardless of the Pollution Exclusion.
The Court agreed with the Owner that the dust cloud was “smoke” and was covered. The insurance policy did not separately define “smoke.” But, the term was used in more than one instance in the same policy, from which the Owner successfully argued an ambiguity. The ambiguity allowed the Owner to successfully argue that “smoke” included “any visible suspension of particles in a gas, including the concrete [saw]dust.”
When signing your next contract, consider how a third-party may interpret it months or years later.
Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Co. v. Zenith Aviation, Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-264 (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia, Aug. 29, 2018)
Roads & Bridges | Written Notice
WRITTEN NOTICE | Beware that strict compliance of the contract might be required.
When an owner replaced a contractor for significant safety violations, […]
Roads & Bridges | Mommie Dearest
MOMMY DEAREST | The story of an ESA without a MOM
Nobody enters this world, or a contract, without a mother: There can […]
IIJA | Does Closing a “Giant Loophole” Cost Contractors?
A recent article published by Roads and Bridges magazine reports that the Office of Management and Budget is working to broaden the scope […]
Roads & Bridges | Buy American Plan Gets an Update
BUY AMERICAN PLAN GETS AN UPDATE
The Office of Management and Budget is developing standards to replace the current Buy […]
Roads & Bridges
Where Does the Buck Stop?
WHERE DOES THE BUCK STOP? | A shallow concrete pour leads to an interesting lawsuit
On the desk of President Harry S. Truman […]
Roads & Bridges | Reshaping Agreements
RESHAPING AGREEMENTS | Oral Agreements Must Be Written in Stone
Reuse, reshaping, and/or reapplication of existing materials was the goal in this roadway […]
Pay-If-Paid Unenforceable in Virginia Starting Jan. 1, 2023
As of Jan. 1, 2023, pay-if-paid clauses are unenforceable, regardless of whether a surety/payment bond claim is involved. This is only for […]
How Short is Too Short
A limitations period is too short when it’s unreasonably short.
Construction Contracting Without Relief Clauses During COVID-19
What to do if your contract lacks the parts to handle COVID-19? Considerations for creating new contracts during COVID-19.
Jonathan J. Straw
Partner | KraftsonCaudle.com
Download Jon’s Bio