It’s tax season again, so it’s time to pay the piper. Despite your efforts to responsibly report and file your taxes with all the allowable deductions and/or adjustments, the Government will find a way to feed itself. The State of Connecticut found a way to do just that to a Contractor despite the State owing the Contractor on a judgment.
Following a successful arbitration, the State of Connecticut Department of Transportation owed to the Contractor a judgment of several million dollars. But, when the Contractor received payment of that judgment from the State, it was “short” by over one million dollars. Upon investigation, the Contractor learned that the State Comptroller had unilaterally reduced the judgment to cover the Contractor’s unpaid taxes. Such taxes were unrelated to the issues successfully arbitrated in the Contractor’s favor.
The Contractor valiantly argued the State could not reduce the judgment amount because the DOT failed to prove the taxes as a setoff or counterclaim during the arbitration. Indeed, the DOT alleged but did not put forth any evidence to prove the amount or that the taxes were overdue. Nevertheless, payment of the judgment triggered review by the Comptroller and State tax statutes authorized the withholding to pay the Contractor’s tax debt.
Paraphrasing an excerpt from Common Sense (1776) by Thomas Paine, government is like an octopus with too many arms and, when one arm fails, another rises to feed the beast.
Connecticut Department of Transportation v. White Oak Corporation, 332 Conn. 776 (Aug. 20, 2019).
Differing Site Conditions: When the Part Does Not Equal the Whole
If all apples are fruit, then why are all fruit not apples?
Forum Selection Can Be a Home-Court Advantage
I promise that any disputes between us will be argued at your house. Time passes and a dispute begins to brew. Now, I want to argue at my house, not at yours. You pay costs to argue at my house that you wouldn’t have incurred had I done as agreed. Should I have to reimburse your costs?
No-Damage-for-Delay and Owner-Related Dispute Clauses are No Defense to Surety Liability Under Miller Act
Prime Government Contractors - you may need to update your interim payment waivers.
Contractual Fairness is Whatever the Parties’ Agreed
When you know a current action or inaction is wrong, but you do not object, should you be allowed to object later?
Which Comes First – Specifications or Drawings?
Sometimes it's not better to ask for forgiveness after-the-fact.
Government Contract Claims: When Appeal is Rejection of Settlement
Without a reservation of rights, appealing a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision is a rejection of any offer of payment or settlement included therein. So, the contractor had only three options.
Linking Obligations
If you want to bind the subcontractor to the prime in every way the same as the prime is bound to the owner, then the incorporation clause of the subcontract should be: . . .
Termination of Government Contracts for Convenience (T4C)
Imagine you’re a Government Contractor under a firm, fixed-price contract and you’ve done nothing wrong. Nevertheless, the Government has decided to unilaterally end its contract with you. Yes, the Government can do this...
Government Contractors: Build a Snowman in August
As a Government Contractor, when have you agreed to perform a certain way, but later realized that another way is better for everybody? When the Government agrees, expressly or impliedly, to the alternative performance, it waives a credit for the unperformed work.
