A limitations period is too short when it’s unreasonably short.
Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the Maryland District Court upholding a one-year contractual limitations period for arbitration. Along with a separate contractual waiver any trial in a traditional court setting, the plaintiff was SOL when he didn’t demand arbitration within one year.
The Court reaffirmed its prior holding from a separate 2007 case that, generally, “limitations periods may be shortened by agreement, so long as the limitations period is not unreasonably short.” Absent the agreement, the plaintiff had three years to file a lawsuit for breach of contract.
See also: When typical limitations don’t apply.
Read, re-read, review, and thoroughly understand your contracts. It’s often better to reasonably act and be rejected than not act or be too late.
Bracey v. Lancaster Foods LLC, No. 19-1292 (4th Cir. Dec. 16, 2020)
Acceptance and Intervening Cause Avoided Construction Warranty Claim
Like cars, computers, and appliances, construction projects include warranties too. Similarly, construction project warranties are limited to causes within the contractor’s control […]
Insurance Company Had No Duty to Defend Under Eight Corners Rule
To decide if an insurer has a duty to defend, a Virginia State or Federal Court may only look at the allegations in the complaint and the insurance policy to determine if a judgment against the insured will be covered by the policy.
Owner SOL When Mandatory Mediation Didn’t Toll Statute of Limitations
Contract interpretation strives to find the meaning of all parts together.
Government Must Review Claims in Good Faith, Not “Conjure Up” a “Baseless Retaliation”
A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor.
Termination for Convenience was OK to Get a Lower Price
When Massachusetts’ highest State court rejected Federal law on termination for convenience (T4C) a public entity’s “sole discretion . . . for […]
Pirates (Parties) Should Arbitrate Arbitrability
Yes, the word “pirates” is an anagram for “parties.” Participants in a lawsuit, arbitration, or mediation are collectively referred to as parties. Are they pirates too?
Very Bad Behavior Without Bad Faith is Not a Breach of Contract
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a majority of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held there was […]
Government Construction Contracts Require Bonds, Even When Contract Doesn’t Say So
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
Government’s Negligent Estimate a Trick?
The Government’s negligent estimate failed to provide the “most current information available.”
