Like cars, computers, and appliances, construction projects include warranties too. Similarly, construction project warranties are limited to causes within the contractor’s control for damages to which the Government or owner has not contributed.
To show a breach of construction warranty, the Government must prove:
- Contractor was responsible for the defective materials or workmanship at issue;
- Government provided timely and proper notice to Contractor; and
- Government did not cause or contribute to the defect(s) or damage(s).
On a $137 million contract for renovation of 22-story historic art deco building located in Boston, Massachusetts, the Contractor installed ball valves of a type different than specified. The Government accepted the Contractor’s installation. Thereafter, an IT services provider unrelated to the Contractor inadvertently bumped/opened one of the water valves enough not to be immediately noticed. But, it was enough to slowly cause nearly $1 million-worth of damage to the building.
The Government failed to prove it did not cause or contribute to the damage since its own IT provider (unrelated to the Contractor) had inadvertently opened the valve.
Notably, the specified valve was a type that required a thumbscrew to open, but the installed/accepted valve was a lever type, which is much easier to inadvertently open.
Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. v. General Services Administration, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Nos. 2953, 2954, 2955, 3596, 4175, 4377, and 5006 (December 19, 2019).
Roads & Bridges | Award Upheld in W. Va. Caisson Dispute
AWARD UPHELD IN W.VA. CAISSON DISPUTE
Federal court reinforces high bar for overturning arbitration
In 2018, the West Virginia Department of Highways (DOH) awarded […]
Roads & Bridges |Let the Contract Lead
LET THE CONTRACT LEAD
Documents offer guidance needed to manage risk without derailing projects
Construction is an industry of managed risk. Whether the prices […]
Roads & Bridges | When is an Invoice Really an Invoice?
WHEN IS AN INVOICE REALLY AN INVOICE?
All court decisions are opinions. Appellate court decisions are typically made by a panel of three […]
Roads & Bridges | Clarifying Punitive Damages
CLARIFYING PUNITIVE DAMAGES
In June 2021, the South Dakota Department of Transportation contracted for the demolition and construction of a bridge on State […]
Roads & Bridges | When Approximate Means Assumed Risk
WHEN APPROXIMATE MEANS ASSUMED RISK
A New York Court Shows How Performance Specifications Can Leave Contractors Holding the Bag
Sometimes when we are told […]
Roads & Bridges | From Roman Arches to AI
FROM ROMAN ARCHES TO AI
Can Construction Evolve Without Risk?
The construction industry blends old with new. From ancient Roman archways and aqueducts and […]
Roads & Bridges | Caught in the Middle
CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE
New Mexico bridge case highlights the importance of written agreements for changes and delay compensation
In construction contracting, hope for […]
Roads & Bridges | Wait and It’s Waived
WAIT AND IT’S WAIVED
Roads & Bridges | Supreme Court Ruling on Arbitration Delay
Don’t wait to arbitrate! Progressing too far down the litigation […]
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
BIDDING BLUNDER
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
For over 125 years, the vast majority of jurisdictions […]
