A football field has only four corners. But, what if you compare two different fields? Now, you have eight corners. In this short example, a Virginia federal court compared only two documents, each with four corners, to decide an insurer had no duty to defend its insured.
A supplier/insured provided a chiller unit to a prime contractor. When the unit didn’t perform as expected, the prime sued the supplier/insured who then, in turn, sought defense and indemnity from the insurer. The court needed only two documents to support its conclusion:
(1) the complaint by prime against supplier/insured and
(2) the insurance policy between insurer and supplier/insured.
(Together, the four corners of each document totaled eight corners.)
To decide if an insurer has a duty to defend, a Virginia State or Federal Court may only look at the allegations in the complaint and the insurance policy to determine if a judgment against the insured will be covered by the policy. If there is a possibility of coverage, then the insurer must defend the insured.
Western World Ins. Co. v. Air Tech, Inc., Case No. 7:17-cv-518 (March 29, 2019)
Trick or Treat in Government Contract Claims
Without a request for a contracting officer’s final decision, claimants may seek treats, but get tricked instead.
Owner Nonpayment is No Defense to Miller Act Claim
As if you needed confirmation that the Federal Miller Act is a powerful tool for unpaid subcontractors, this is it. Even when a Prime ordered and accepted the Sub’s work, but didn’t have to pay under the Subcontract, the Subcontractor still. . . .
Trust, but Verify
Rely at your own risk upon a Contracting Officer’s statements when statutes or contract provisions may conflict.
Payment for Verbal Changes When a Writing was “Required”
Even if your agreement can only be modified by a writing, you may still have a good argument to be paid for extra work.
Pirates and Arbitration
How does a pirate solve a dispute (besides walking the plank)?
Bases Covered?
Contractors, will your current insurance policy cover “your work” as a joint venture partner? The typical answer is NO.
Two Paths at the Same Time to the Same Place
“Two roads diverged in a wood, and . . .” the Prime Contractor had to take both roads at the same time to the same place.
Rules, Which Rules?
Good Idea: Include a choice of law clause in your contract to promote consistency and predictability (while reducing potential costs and risk).
Government Liability for Third-Party Delays
Generally, the Government is not responsible for delays caused by third parties, even other contractors at its own project site, unless the Government affirmatively indicates the site will be ready and available.
