Has your work on a government contract ever been delayed by another contractor? Did you (the prime contractor) have no control over the other contractor or entity? Did the Government promise you the other contractor would not inhibit your work? If yes to all three, consider the following success story of a Contractor’s recovery for delays against the Government caused by a third-party:
The successful Contractor under an IDIQ contract to perform canal excavation and sediment removal for the Department of Agriculture in St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana. Contractor encountered delays due to the continued presence of another contractor under a separate government contract at the same project site.
Key to the recovery was that during pre-bid site visit, the Contractor asked if the third-party’s work would be complete prior to the Contractor starting work. The Government replied, “Yes!” Fortunately for the Contractor, the pre-bid Q&A’s were made a part of the Contract by the Government’s own express direction.
Generally, the Government is not responsible for delays caused by third parties, even other contractors at its own project site, unless the Government affirmatively indicates the site will be ready and available.
The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals found the pre-bid Q&A’s were sufficient to establish a warranty by the Government that the site would be available. The Contractor recovered from the Government for the delays caused by the third-party contractor.
Roads & Bridges | Award Upheld in W. Va. Caisson Dispute
AWARD UPHELD IN W.VA. CAISSON DISPUTE
Federal court reinforces high bar for overturning arbitration
In 2018, the West Virginia Department of Highways (DOH) awarded […]
Roads & Bridges |Let the Contract Lead
LET THE CONTRACT LEAD
Documents offer guidance needed to manage risk without derailing projects
Construction is an industry of managed risk. Whether the prices […]
Roads & Bridges | When is an Invoice Really an Invoice?
WHEN IS AN INVOICE REALLY AN INVOICE?
All court decisions are opinions. Appellate court decisions are typically made by a panel of three […]
Roads & Bridges | Clarifying Punitive Damages
CLARIFYING PUNITIVE DAMAGES
In June 2021, the South Dakota Department of Transportation contracted for the demolition and construction of a bridge on State […]
Roads & Bridges | When Approximate Means Assumed Risk
WHEN APPROXIMATE MEANS ASSUMED RISK
A New York Court Shows How Performance Specifications Can Leave Contractors Holding the Bag
Sometimes when we are told […]
Roads & Bridges | From Roman Arches to AI
FROM ROMAN ARCHES TO AI
Can Construction Evolve Without Risk?
The construction industry blends old with new. From ancient Roman archways and aqueducts and […]
Roads & Bridges | Caught in the Middle
CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE
New Mexico bridge case highlights the importance of written agreements for changes and delay compensation
In construction contracting, hope for […]
Roads & Bridges | Wait and It’s Waived
WAIT AND IT’S WAIVED
Roads & Bridges | Supreme Court Ruling on Arbitration Delay
Don’t wait to arbitrate! Progressing too far down the litigation […]
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
BIDDING BLUNDER
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
For over 125 years, the vast majority of jurisdictions […]
