Contractors, will your current insurance policy cover “your work” as a joint venture partner?
The typical answer is NO. This is simply because your policy as a sole contractor is based upon a predicted scope of risk. A JV’s risk is usually larger than a sole contractor’s risk. Even a minority partner’s risk as a JV member is usually greater than as a sole contractor because each JV partner is liable for the entire risk of the JV, despite the JV agreement that may allocate that liability – that’s only applicable within the JV, not to outside parties.
Insurance coverage for a Joint Venture is typically either by:
- A specific policy for the JV or
- Separate policies for each JV member.
For Example:
On a student housing project in Raleigh, NC, a new building under construction by a JV started to lean, damaging other portions of the building. The JV and subcontractors repaired the work and out of the total repair costs of about $14.4 million, JV was responsible for about $4 million.
One of the two JV partners sought reimbursement from its own CGL insurer (not the JV’s insurer). The JV partner’s Insurer argued that the JV partner’s separate policy excluded coverage for the partner’s liabilities while working as a JV partner.
Thankfully, the JV partner had previously purchased a separate JV Endorsement to cover its potential liability to third-parties as a JV partner. The Court did not rule on whether there was coverage for liability between the two JV partners (i.e., liability within the JV, not between the JV and third-parties).
Roads & Bridges | Award Upheld in W. Va. Caisson Dispute
AWARD UPHELD IN W.VA. CAISSON DISPUTE
Federal court reinforces high bar for overturning arbitration
In 2018, the West Virginia Department of Highways (DOH) awarded […]
Roads & Bridges |Let the Contract Lead
LET THE CONTRACT LEAD
Documents offer guidance needed to manage risk without derailing projects
Construction is an industry of managed risk. Whether the prices […]
Roads & Bridges | When is an Invoice Really an Invoice?
WHEN IS AN INVOICE REALLY AN INVOICE?
All court decisions are opinions. Appellate court decisions are typically made by a panel of three […]
Roads & Bridges | Clarifying Punitive Damages
CLARIFYING PUNITIVE DAMAGES
In June 2021, the South Dakota Department of Transportation contracted for the demolition and construction of a bridge on State […]
Roads & Bridges | When Approximate Means Assumed Risk
WHEN APPROXIMATE MEANS ASSUMED RISK
A New York Court Shows How Performance Specifications Can Leave Contractors Holding the Bag
Sometimes when we are told […]
Roads & Bridges | From Roman Arches to AI
FROM ROMAN ARCHES TO AI
Can Construction Evolve Without Risk?
The construction industry blends old with new. From ancient Roman archways and aqueducts and […]
Roads & Bridges | Caught in the Middle
CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE
New Mexico bridge case highlights the importance of written agreements for changes and delay compensation
In construction contracting, hope for […]
Roads & Bridges | Wait and It’s Waived
WAIT AND IT’S WAIVED
Roads & Bridges | Supreme Court Ruling on Arbitration Delay
Don’t wait to arbitrate! Progressing too far down the litigation […]
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
BIDDING BLUNDER
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
For over 125 years, the vast majority of jurisdictions […]
