In Washington D.C., a private Owner sued its Designer alleging professional negligence arising from the construction of $10 million tennis and education facility. Among other issues, the court held the Owner’s professional negligence claim was late as it was filed more than three years after accrual (D.C. Code § 12-301(3)).
The contract required:
- a request for mediation before filing a lawsuit and
- that any lawsuit must be filed within three years.
The Owner unsuccessfully argued that only its request for mediation was necessary within three years. Yet, a related provision of the contract stated that a mediation request could be made at the same time as the filing of a lawsuit. If a mediation request tolled the statute, this related provision would be meaningless.
Contract interpretation strives to find the meaning of all parts together. So, when you think you’ve found the right answer in your contract, keep reading all parts together to be certain. (Read Related Post.)
Navigating the Requirements for Claims against Virginia Public Entities
Contractors making claims against Virginia public entities must follow ALL applicable requirements. Such requirements may be found in several places, so check […]
Virginia General Contractors Not Protected from Pre-Work Claim Waivers
On March 2, 2018, the Governor approved an act of the Virginia General Assembly to make unenforceable pre-work waivers of lien rights […]
Adding Terms to a Government Contract without Saying So
Imagine an incredulous Contractor asking, “Show me in the Contract where it says I’m supposed to do X?” The Government Contracting Officer smugly answers, “even though the Contract doesn’t say so, you must do it anyway.” Is that even possible, when, how?
Differing Site Conditions: When the Part Does Not Equal the Whole
If all apples are fruit, then why are all fruit not apples?
Forum Selection Can Be a Home-Court Advantage
I promise that any disputes between us will be argued at your house. Time passes and a dispute begins to brew. Now, I want to argue at my house, not at yours. You pay costs to argue at my house that you wouldn’t have incurred had I done as agreed. Should I have to reimburse your costs?
No-Damage-for-Delay and Owner-Related Dispute Clauses are No Defense to Surety Liability Under Miller Act
Prime Government Contractors - you may need to update your interim payment waivers.
Contractual Fairness is Whatever the Parties’ Agreed
When you know a current action or inaction is wrong, but you do not object, should you be allowed to object later?
Which Comes First – Specifications or Drawings?
Sometimes it's not better to ask for forgiveness after-the-fact.
Government Contract Claims: When Appeal is Rejection of Settlement
Without a reservation of rights, appealing a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision is a rejection of any offer of payment or settlement included therein. So, the contractor had only three options.
