If all apples are fruit, then why are all fruit not apples? Because the part does not represent the whole. A Government Contractor discovered this when it learned that all unsuitable material was unsatisfactory material; but, all unsatisfactory material was not unsuitable material. Let me explain . . .
Under a Contract with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for two explosives storage magazines and a storm drain at Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey, “unsatisfactory materials” were to be replaced with satisfactory materials. Basically, “unsatisfactory materials” included anything that could not be used as backfill.
As is typical, the Corps answered several pre-bid questions that later became amendments to the Contract. One of the Corps’ answers stated, “assume unsuitable material is not encountered.” The Contractor improperly equated “unsuitable material” with “unsatisfactory material.”
Although the term “unsuitable material” was not separately defined in the Contract, the Court found that other Contract provisions (e.g., pre-bid Q&A’s, specs, and soil borings) helped to define it as “unsatisfactory material” but only at certain depths/locations. Thus, the pre-bid Q&A did not pertain to “unsatisfactory materials” generally; but, only a subset of unsatisfactory materials – “unsuitable materials.”
While the whole included the part (unsatisfactory material included all unsuitable material), the part did not equal the whole (unsuitable material did not include all unsatisfactory material).
Claim Certified with Digital Signature Deemed OK
The law is not a trend-setter. It doesn’t readily change or adapt to tech. So, a commonplace practice in business became a dispute when a claimant digitally certified a claim under the Contract Disputes Act.
Acceptance and Intervening Cause Avoided Construction Warranty Claim
Like cars, computers, and appliances, construction projects include warranties too. Similarly, construction project warranties are limited to causes within the contractor’s control […]
Insurance Company Had No Duty to Defend Under Eight Corners Rule
To decide if an insurer has a duty to defend, a Virginia State or Federal Court may only look at the allegations in the complaint and the insurance policy to determine if a judgment against the insured will be covered by the policy.
Owner SOL When Mandatory Mediation Didn’t Toll Statute of Limitations
Contract interpretation strives to find the meaning of all parts together.
Government Must Review Claims in Good Faith, Not “Conjure Up” a “Baseless Retaliation”
A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor.
Termination for Convenience was OK to Get a Lower Price
When Massachusetts’ highest State court rejected Federal law on termination for convenience (T4C) a public entity’s “sole discretion . . . for […]
Pirates (Parties) Should Arbitrate Arbitrability
Yes, the word “pirates” is an anagram for “parties.” Participants in a lawsuit, arbitration, or mediation are collectively referred to as parties. Are they pirates too?
Very Bad Behavior Without Bad Faith is Not a Breach of Contract
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a majority of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held there was […]
Government Construction Contracts Require Bonds, Even When Contract Doesn’t Say So
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
