As a Government Contractor, when have you agreed to perform a certain way, but later realized that another way is better for everybody? When the Government agrees, expressly or impliedly, to the alternative performance, it waives a credit for the unperformed work.
In a recent example, under a design-build contract, a Government Contractor agreed to construct permanent bridges over irrigation canals in El Paso County, TX. (As an aside, the coldest night of my life was spent in Guadalupe National Park, just east of this project at negative 15 degrees in December.) The Contractor’s original plan included temporary bridges. After contract award, the Contractor successfully and timely performed its work without the temporary bridges. The Army Corps of Engineers knew of the Contractor’s plan and the changes to that plan, but without objection. Nevertheless, the Government sought a credit for unperformed, temporary bridges.
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held that where the Government agrees to a planned method, but then does not object to a change in that method, the Government waives a credit, if any, for the savings from the change in method.
Read more about this example at ENR.com: Board Backs Contractor In Corps Cost Discovery Dispute
Appeal of American West Construction, LLC, ASBCA No. 61094 (December 19, 2017).
Acceptance and Intervening Cause Avoided Construction Warranty Claim
Like cars, computers, and appliances, construction projects include warranties too. Similarly, construction project warranties are limited to causes within the contractor’s control […]
Insurance Company Had No Duty to Defend Under Eight Corners Rule
To decide if an insurer has a duty to defend, a Virginia State or Federal Court may only look at the allegations in the complaint and the insurance policy to determine if a judgment against the insured will be covered by the policy.
Owner SOL When Mandatory Mediation Didn’t Toll Statute of Limitations
Contract interpretation strives to find the meaning of all parts together.
Government Must Review Claims in Good Faith, Not “Conjure Up” a “Baseless Retaliation”
A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor.
Termination for Convenience was OK to Get a Lower Price
When Massachusetts’ highest State court rejected Federal law on termination for convenience (T4C) a public entity’s “sole discretion . . . for […]
Pirates (Parties) Should Arbitrate Arbitrability
Yes, the word “pirates” is an anagram for “parties.” Participants in a lawsuit, arbitration, or mediation are collectively referred to as parties. Are they pirates too?
Very Bad Behavior Without Bad Faith is Not a Breach of Contract
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a majority of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held there was […]
Government Construction Contracts Require Bonds, Even When Contract Doesn’t Say So
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
Government’s Negligent Estimate a Trick?
The Government’s negligent estimate failed to provide the “most current information available.”
