Contractors, will your current insurance policy cover “your work” as a joint venture partner?
The typical answer is NO. This is simply because your policy as a sole contractor is based upon a predicted scope of risk. A JV’s risk is usually larger than a sole contractor’s risk. Even a minority partner’s risk as a JV member is usually greater than as a sole contractor because each JV partner is liable for the entire risk of the JV, despite the JV agreement that may allocate that liability – that’s only applicable within the JV, not to outside parties.
Insurance coverage for a Joint Venture is typically either by:
- A specific policy for the JV or
- Separate policies for each JV member.
For Example:
On a student housing project in Raleigh, NC, a new building under construction by a JV started to lean, damaging other portions of the building. The JV and subcontractors repaired the work and out of the total repair costs of about $14.4 million, JV was responsible for about $4 million.
One of the two JV partners sought reimbursement from its own CGL insurer (not the JV’s insurer). The JV partner’s Insurer argued that the JV partner’s separate policy excluded coverage for the partner’s liabilities while working as a JV partner.
Thankfully, the JV partner had previously purchased a separate JV Endorsement to cover its potential liability to third-parties as a JV partner. The Court did not rule on whether there was coverage for liability between the two JV partners (i.e., liability within the JV, not between the JV and third-parties).
Government Must Review Claims in Good Faith, Not “Conjure Up” a “Baseless Retaliation”
A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor.
Termination for Convenience was OK to Get a Lower Price
When Massachusetts’ highest State court rejected Federal law on termination for convenience (T4C) a public entity’s “sole discretion . . . for […]
Pirates (Parties) Should Arbitrate Arbitrability
Yes, the word “pirates” is an anagram for “parties.” Participants in a lawsuit, arbitration, or mediation are collectively referred to as parties. Are they pirates too?
Very Bad Behavior Without Bad Faith is Not a Breach of Contract
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a majority of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held there was […]
Government Construction Contracts Require Bonds, Even When Contract Doesn’t Say So
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
Government’s Negligent Estimate a Trick?
The Government’s negligent estimate failed to provide the “most current information available.”
Prime Contractor Had No Duty to Help Surety Investigate Sub’s Default
We all know what happens when we “ASS-U-ME” something. So, we should all carefully avoid assuming things unnecessarily.
It’s Good to Be the King
Mel Brooks in the movie History of the World: Part I (1981) said it best – “It’s good to be the King.” It’s also true when asserting claims against the State or an arm or agent of the State.
Smoke Without Fire: Damage from Concrete Dust Covered by Insurance
You’ve heard, “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” In this instance, the smoke was concrete dust that damaged a warehouse full of aircraft […]










