How often have you wanted to take a dispute “to the mattresses” (think, The Godfather), but the cost was prohibitive? You have a winnable case, but the cost to prove it is not worth it. Often, this rationale results in settlement – the subject of another post. One of the largest cost items to prove your case can be attorneys’ fees.
Under the so-called “American Rule,” each party pays his, her, or its own attorneys’ fees, regardless of the outcome. The terms of an agreement, however, can modify that general rule by including a provision granting, typically, the prevailing party its attorneys’ fees spent to win the case.
But, even if you forgot to or were unable to include such a provision in your contract, consider whether there is an arbitration provision? Does that arbitration provision incorporate the Rules of the AAA (the American Arbitration Association, not the roadside assistance entity)?
Under the current Rule-48 of the AAA Construction Industry Arbitration Rules, the arbitration award to the winning/prevailing party “may include . . . an award of attorneys’ fees if all parties have requested such an award” AND even if the agreement does not provide for an award of attorneys’ fees to a prevailing party. City of Chesterfield v. Frederich Construction, Inc., 2015 WL 1814471 (Mo. Ct. App., Apr. 21, 2015).
In City of Chesterfield, the Missouri Court of Appeals held that because both parties requested attorneys’ fees in the early pleading phase (i.e., demand for arbitration and answering statement) and because the arbitrators so chose to invoke Rule-48 (Rule-45 at the time of the decision as the AAA Rules were most recently revised in July 2015), the prevailing party received its attorneys’ fees spent to achieve that victory.
Next time you have the choice of whether to arbitrate or litigate, consider how the AAA Rules may influence your decision. For example, if there is no attorneys’ fees provision in your contract, but the AAA apply, then if you’re on the fence whether to litigate or arbitrate and you have a good case, and all other things are equal, you could get attorneys’ fees when/if you succeed. On the other hand, if you’re answering a demand for arbitration, think twice before absent-mindedly demanding attorneys’ fees if you’re case has some large potential pitfalls.
Acceptance and Intervening Cause Avoided Construction Warranty Claim
Like cars, computers, and appliances, construction projects include warranties too. Similarly, construction project warranties are limited to causes within the contractor’s control […]
Insurance Company Had No Duty to Defend Under Eight Corners Rule
To decide if an insurer has a duty to defend, a Virginia State or Federal Court may only look at the allegations in the complaint and the insurance policy to determine if a judgment against the insured will be covered by the policy.
Owner SOL When Mandatory Mediation Didn’t Toll Statute of Limitations
Contract interpretation strives to find the meaning of all parts together.
Government Must Review Claims in Good Faith, Not “Conjure Up” a “Baseless Retaliation”
A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor.
Termination for Convenience was OK to Get a Lower Price
When Massachusetts’ highest State court rejected Federal law on termination for convenience (T4C) a public entity’s “sole discretion . . . for […]
Pirates (Parties) Should Arbitrate Arbitrability
Yes, the word “pirates” is an anagram for “parties.” Participants in a lawsuit, arbitration, or mediation are collectively referred to as parties. Are they pirates too?
Very Bad Behavior Without Bad Faith is Not a Breach of Contract
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a majority of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held there was […]
Government Construction Contracts Require Bonds, Even When Contract Doesn’t Say So
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
Government’s Negligent Estimate a Trick?
The Government’s negligent estimate failed to provide the “most current information available.”










