General Contractors: When was the last time a private owner asked you to waive your lien rights before you did any work? If you do in the near future, you cannot require the same of your subcontractors and lower tiers.
The Virginia General Assembly has passed, and the Governor will soon likely sign, Senate Bill 891. Under the new and revised Code sections, subcontractors and lower tier subs and suppliers cannot waive their rights to liens or claims before providing labor and materials. This has been true in Maryland for nearly two decades.
This new Virginia law does not invalidate lien/claim waivers executed after a subcontractor or supplier provides labor and materials. Indeed, Virginia case law is supportive of lien/claim waivers executed after providing labor and materials. A court’s interpretation of the waiver will depend on the specific language used. So, the waiver language used should be precise and, under the new Code section, will only apply to labor and materials already furnished.
Take care when requiring that subcontractors and suppliers execute lien waivers before receiving payment, you may later be relying on the language in those waivers.
Claim Certified with Digital Signature Deemed OK
The law is not a trend-setter. It doesn’t readily change or adapt to tech. So, a commonplace practice in business became a dispute when a claimant digitally certified a claim under the Contract Disputes Act.
Acceptance and Intervening Cause Avoided Construction Warranty Claim
Like cars, computers, and appliances, construction projects include warranties too. Similarly, construction project warranties are limited to causes within the contractor’s control […]
Insurance Company Had No Duty to Defend Under Eight Corners Rule
To decide if an insurer has a duty to defend, a Virginia State or Federal Court may only look at the allegations in the complaint and the insurance policy to determine if a judgment against the insured will be covered by the policy.
Owner SOL When Mandatory Mediation Didn’t Toll Statute of Limitations
Contract interpretation strives to find the meaning of all parts together.
Government Must Review Claims in Good Faith, Not “Conjure Up” a “Baseless Retaliation”
A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor.
Termination for Convenience was OK to Get a Lower Price
When Massachusetts’ highest State court rejected Federal law on termination for convenience (T4C) a public entity’s “sole discretion . . . for […]
Pirates (Parties) Should Arbitrate Arbitrability
Yes, the word “pirates” is an anagram for “parties.” Participants in a lawsuit, arbitration, or mediation are collectively referred to as parties. Are they pirates too?
Very Bad Behavior Without Bad Faith is Not a Breach of Contract
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a majority of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held there was […]
Government Construction Contracts Require Bonds, Even When Contract Doesn’t Say So
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
