Among its other duties, the Defense Logistics Agency is charged with disposing of and re-purposing certain surplus military equipment. After several years of failing to keep up with such duties, the Government outsourced the work to a Contractor. With the RFP, the Government’s work estimate included: (1) historical workload data and (2) workload projections.
Soon after performance began, the Contractor encountered a significant backlog of work. No information about a backlog was included in the RFP or related communication. The Government refused to negotiate an equitable adjustment, denied the Contractor’s claim, and the Court of Federal Claims found no fault by the Government.
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the Court of Federal Claims and held the Government’s negligent estimate failed to provide the “most current information available.” Such information included the Government’s knowledge that there was a significant backlog of work facing the Contractor. The Government’s obligation to provide a “realistic estimate [including] the most current information available” doesn’t mean it must go out and create such information. Rather, to the extent such information exists, the Government must share it with the Contractor.
Although the Government’s behavior was only negligent (i.e., not intentional), it seems like a trick to withhold pertinent information while demanding the work be performed and refusing to pay for it.
Ultimately, the Contractor was entitled to an equitable adjustment to the contract price and time for the backlog.
Agility Defense & Government Services, Inc. v. United States, 847 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
Owner SOL When Mandatory Mediation Didn’t Toll Statute of Limitations
Contract interpretation strives to find the meaning of all parts together.
Government Must Review Claims in Good Faith, Not “Conjure Up” a “Baseless Retaliation”
A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor.
Termination for Convenience was OK to Get a Lower Price
When Massachusetts’ highest State court rejected Federal law on termination for convenience (T4C) a public entity’s “sole discretion . . . for […]
Pirates (Parties) Should Arbitrate Arbitrability
Yes, the word “pirates” is an anagram for “parties.” Participants in a lawsuit, arbitration, or mediation are collectively referred to as parties. Are they pirates too?
Very Bad Behavior Without Bad Faith is Not a Breach of Contract
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a majority of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held there was […]
Government Construction Contracts Require Bonds, Even When Contract Doesn’t Say So
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
Government’s Negligent Estimate a Trick?
The Government’s negligent estimate failed to provide the “most current information available.”
Prime Contractor Had No Duty to Help Surety Investigate Sub’s Default
We all know what happens when we “ASS-U-ME” something. So, we should all carefully avoid assuming things unnecessarily.
It’s Good to Be the King
Mel Brooks in the movie History of the World: Part I (1981) said it best – “It’s good to be the King.” It’s also true when asserting claims against the State or an arm or agent of the State.
