Do you remember the Choose Your Own Adventure books?  If you are a subcontractor on a federal project, where should you bring a lawsuit to get paid?  If you are a prime contractor on a federal project, would you like the convenience of defending such a lawsuit in your own backyard?

The Federal Miller Act is designed to enforce payment for work on public buildings and public works when the U.S. Government is a party to the prime contract.  Typically, a lawsuit by a subcontractor or material supplier seeking payment must be filed in the same geographic area where the Project is located. (40 USC § 3133(b)(3)(B)).  However, a forum selection clause may differ and determine where such a lawsuit must be filed.

In mid-July 2015, a Federal District Court transferred a case from Connecticut to Virginia by applying a valid forum selection clause in a Miller Act lawsuit.  The project was for refurbishment of a barracks building located at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Connecticut.  Typically then, Connecticut would be the proper place to file a Miller Act lawsuit.

However, the subcontract provided that all “claims related in any way or manner to the Subcontract Work . . . shall be litigated in” Virginia.  The Federal Court in Connecticut followed the same logic as some other Federal Circuits (1st, 5th, 8th, and 10th) and found that when the forum selection clause is otherwise valid, it will be upheld even when the Federal Statute does not expressly provide for anything different (i.e., the Federal Statute states the Miller Act lawsuit “must” be filed where the Project is located).

U.S. Courts Map (Credit: Wikipedia)

U.S. Courts Map (Credit: Wikipedia)

The Connecticut Federal District Court also noted that Virginia law, not Connecticut law, applied to interpret the Subcontract, but this alone was not a reason to transfer the case to Virginia.

Keystone: If your Project is located in any of the Federal Circuits following the same reasoning (1st, 5th, 8th, and 10th Circuits) and your subcontract provides for a specific place to file the lawsuit, you should consider it as a defensive maneuver as a prime contractor or for efficiency sake as a subcontractor.

Case: QSR Steel Corporation, LLC v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America, Case No. 3:14-1017 (U.S.D.C., Dist. Conn., July 16, 2015).

Published On: July 27, 2015

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Linking Obligations

January 24, 2018|

If you want to bind the subcontractor to the prime in every way the same as the prime is bound to the owner, then the incorporation clause of the subcontract should be: . . .

Termination of Government Contracts for Convenience (T4C)

January 16, 2018|

Imagine you’re a Government Contractor under a firm, fixed-price contract and you’ve done nothing wrong.  Nevertheless, the Government has decided to unilaterally end its contract with you.  Yes, the Government can do this...

Government Contractors: Build a Snowman in August

January 8, 2018|

As a Government Contractor, when have you agreed to perform a certain way, but later realized that another way is better for everybody?  When the Government agrees, expressly or impliedly, to the alternative performance, it waives a credit for the unperformed work.

E-mail Signature Not Enough to Certify a Claim

December 5, 2017|

Construction project professionals routinely send e-mails with “signatures,” which typically include the sender’s typewritten name, title, contact information, and/or company logo.  But, this sort of e-mail “signature” is not enough to certify a claim to the Government.

Constructive Acceleration

November 14, 2017|

Contractors know that time is money.  So, the point is clear when expressly told to “Speed Up!  Go Faster!”

But, what do you […]

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan J. Straw
Best Lawyers® - Jonathan Straw | 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!