Under a cost-reimbursement, plus incentive fee contract with the Department of Energy, the Contractor agreed to build a Mixed Oxide FuelFabrication Facility near Aiken, South Carolina.  The purpose of the project was to convert weapons-grade plutonium into fuel rods for use in commercial nuclear powerplants. 

In denying one of the Contractor’s certified claims, the Government summarily clawed back $21.6 million of incentive fees previously paid to the Contractor.  The Contractor argued that the Government could not do this before the contract performance was complete.  The Court agreed with the Contractor and ordered return of the entire sum by the Government to the Contractor.

The Court saw the Government’s claw-back attempt as “baseless retaliation” and implied failure by the contracting officer to review the claim in good faith.  “A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor,” like prematurely demanding the immediate refund of incentive fees.

CB&IAreva Mox Services, LLC v. U.S., Ct. of Fed. Claims Nos. 16-950C, 17-2017C,18-80C, 18-522C, 18-677C, 18-691C, 18-710C (June 11, 2018)

Published On: February 12, 2019

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Linking Obligations

January 24, 2018|

If you want to bind the subcontractor to the prime in every way the same as the prime is bound to the owner, then the incorporation clause of the subcontract should be: . . .

Termination of Government Contracts for Convenience (T4C)

January 16, 2018|

Imagine you’re a Government Contractor under a firm, fixed-price contract and you’ve done nothing wrong.  Nevertheless, the Government has decided to unilaterally end its contract with you.  Yes, the Government can do this...

Government Contractors: Build a Snowman in August

January 8, 2018|

As a Government Contractor, when have you agreed to perform a certain way, but later realized that another way is better for everybody?  When the Government agrees, expressly or impliedly, to the alternative performance, it waives a credit for the unperformed work.

E-mail Signature Not Enough to Certify a Claim

December 5, 2017|

Construction project professionals routinely send e-mails with “signatures,” which typically include the sender’s typewritten name, title, contact information, and/or company logo.  But, this sort of e-mail “signature” is not enough to certify a claim to the Government.

Constructive Acceleration

November 14, 2017|

Contractors know that time is money.  So, the point is clear when expressly told to “Speed Up!  Go Faster!”

But, what do you […]

Construction Contracts & Whodunit

November 7, 2017|

Imagine reading a crime novel and just when you think you figured out whodunit, a plot twist suggests a different culprit. In construction contracting, finding the right answer can be a difficult task when

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan J. Straw
Best Lawyers® - Jonathan Straw | 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!