Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a majority of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held there was no breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. Yet, the Contractor recovered almost all of its claimed damages because the Corps forced the Contractor to sign a modification under duress and ignored a significant constructive change.
In this story, two bids were submitted for maintenance dredging of the Scarborough River, Scarborough, Maine. The successful bidder was 40% lower than the Government’s initial estimate. Before contract award the Corps requested a change to the winning bidder’s plan at no additional cost to the Government and the Corps revised its Government estimate to be only 14% higher than the winning bid.
After award, the Corps unilaterally reduced the amounts it had agreed to pay for certain CLINs, which effectively cut off the contractor’s cash flow for the Project.
From these facts, a minority of the Board found the Corps breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing. However, a majority of the Board held there was no breach, despite the Corps’ “abhorrent” and unreasonable behavior. (A split of opinion on the Board is rare.)
The full opinion has more detail of how unfairly the Corps treated the Contractor.
Appeals of North American Landscaping, Construction, and Dredge, Co., Inc., Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Nos. 60235, 60236, 60237, and 60238 (August 9, 2018).
Linking Obligations
If you want to bind the subcontractor to the prime in every way the same as the prime is bound to the owner, then the incorporation clause of the subcontract should be: . . .
Termination of Government Contracts for Convenience (T4C)
Imagine you’re a Government Contractor under a firm, fixed-price contract and you’ve done nothing wrong. Nevertheless, the Government has decided to unilaterally end its contract with you. Yes, the Government can do this...
Government Contractors: Build a Snowman in August
As a Government Contractor, when have you agreed to perform a certain way, but later realized that another way is better for everybody? When the Government agrees, expressly or impliedly, to the alternative performance, it waives a credit for the unperformed work.
Construction Dispute Settlement: Dealing with Details
Reap the benefits of settling a construction dispute by doing these things.
E-mail Signature Not Enough to Certify a Claim
Construction project professionals routinely send e-mails with “signatures,” which typically include the sender’s typewritten name, title, contact information, and/or company logo. But, this sort of e-mail “signature” is not enough to certify a claim to the Government.
Government Contractors: Ask for a “Sum Certain” in Your Claim
If your Claim includes an item for damages with an amount “TBD,” you could lose the entire Claim.
Contractors: Be Aware When Contracting with Virginia Public Agencies
Without a valid contract, a Virginia public entity has no duty to to pay for any of your work.
Constructive Acceleration
Contractors know that time is money. So, the point is clear when expressly told to “Speed Up! Go Faster!”
But, what do you […]
Construction Contracts & Whodunit
Imagine reading a crime novel and just when you think you figured out whodunit, a plot twist suggests a different culprit. In construction contracting, finding the right answer can be a difficult task when
