Imagine you’re a Government Contractor under a firm, fixed-price contract and you’ve done nothing wrong.  Nevertheless, the Government has decided to unilaterally end its contract with you.  Yes, the Government can do this (for almost any reason).  No, you cannot get your anticipated profit for unperformed work.  You can only recover:

  1. Costs you actually incurred;
  2. Profit on the work actually done; and
  3. Costs of preparing a termination settlement proposal.

Costs actually incurred include preparing to perform (e.g., costs incurred after award and before notice-to-proceed) because “a settlement should compensate the contractor fairly for the work done and preparations made for the terminated portions of the contract…”). FAR 49.201(a); Appeal of Pro-Built Construction Firm, ASBCA No. 59278 (June 1, 2017).

“Cost and accounting data may provide guides, but are not rigid measures, for ascertaining fair compensation.” FAR 49.201(c).  But, contract line items (CLINs) regarding price have no meaning in a T4C settlement focused on costs.  Appeal of Atlas Sahil Construction Co., ASBCA No. 58951 (November 9, 2017).

If you get a T4C notice, promptly stop incurring further costs and present a reasonable and well-supported termination settlement proposal to the Government.

Published On: January 16, 2018

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

E-mail Signature Not Enough to Certify a Claim

December 5, 2017|

Construction project professionals routinely send e-mails with “signatures,” which typically include the sender’s typewritten name, title, contact information, and/or company logo.  But, this sort of e-mail “signature” is not enough to certify a claim to the Government.

Constructive Acceleration

November 14, 2017|

Contractors know that time is money.  So, the point is clear when expressly told to “Speed Up!  Go Faster!”

But, what do you […]

Construction Contracts & Whodunit

November 7, 2017|

Imagine reading a crime novel and just when you think you figured out whodunit, a plot twist suggests a different culprit. In construction contracting, finding the right answer can be a difficult task when

Owner Nonpayment is No Defense to Miller Act Claim

October 24, 2017|

As if you needed confirmation that the Federal Miller Act is a powerful tool for unpaid subcontractors, this is it.  Even when a Prime ordered and accepted the Sub’s work, but didn’t have to pay under the Subcontract, the Subcontractor still. . . .

Trust, but Verify

October 17, 2017|

Rely at your own risk upon a Contracting Officer’s statements when statutes or contract provisions may conflict.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan J. Straw
Best Lawyers® - Jonathan Straw | 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!