CONTRACT TERMINATION | An unpredictable case teaches hard lessons to each party involved

Court decisions are “opinions.” There are majority and dissenting (disagreeing) opinions. Consistency in opinions across different courts, judges and cases promotes certainty and efficiency. Although courts may strive for consistency as they apply the facts of each case to the applicable laws, opinions can be varied and unpredictable. Opinions differed in this case involving more than six different judges.

Continue reading…

 

 

Published On: September 9, 2024

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages

February 24, 2024|

LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable

Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.

In June 2017, […]

  • Roads & Bridges | Warranty Provisions

Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions

January 25, 2024|

WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results

You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]

Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters

October 17, 2023|

CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity

What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]

  • Sum Certain Blog Post

Jurisdiction is Power

August 27, 2023|

Not bad power, but the ability of a decision-maker (e.g., court) to decide which side is right (or which is more correct). […]

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan J. Straw
Best Lawyers® - Jonathan Straw | 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!