CONNECTING THE DOTS | Showing Causation in Contracting Cases is Critical

In this asphalt case, the prime contractor agreed to perform a $13 million road project for the South Dakota Department of Transportation on U.S. Highway 83 in Lyman and Stanley Counties in South Dakota (near the State Capitol of Pierre). The prime subcontracted with plaintiff for just under $3 million-worth of aggregates and asphalt paving work. Three asphalt mixes were to be used: base course, Superpave, and Class S. The plan was to complete all paving work from about mid-June until mid-September. The Sub’s work was subject to inspection and acceptance by the DOT.

Continue reading…

 

 

Published On: March 7, 2024

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages

February 24, 2024|

LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable

Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.

In June 2017, […]

  • Roads & Bridges | Warranty Provisions

Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions

January 25, 2024|

WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results

You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]

Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters

October 17, 2023|

CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity

What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]

  • Sum Certain Blog Post

Jurisdiction is Power

August 27, 2023|

Not bad power, but the ability of a decision-maker (e.g., court) to decide which side is right (or which is more correct). […]

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan J. Straw
Best Lawyers® - Jonathan Straw | 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!