Among its other duties, the Defense Logistics Agency is charged with disposing of and re-purposing certain surplus military equipment. After several years of failing to keep up with such duties, the Government outsourced the work to a Contractor. With the RFP, the Government’s work estimate included: (1) historical workload data and (2) workload projections.
Soon after performance began, the Contractor encountered a significant backlog of work. No information about a backlog was included in the RFP or related communication. The Government refused to negotiate an equitable adjustment, denied the Contractor’s claim, and the Court of Federal Claims found no fault by the Government.
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the Court of Federal Claims and held the Government’s negligent estimate failed to provide the “most current information available.” Such information included the Government’s knowledge that there was a significant backlog of work facing the Contractor. The Government’s obligation to provide a “realistic estimate [including] the most current information available” doesn’t mean it must go out and create such information. Rather, to the extent such information exists, the Government must share it with the Contractor.
Although the Government’s behavior was only negligent (i.e., not intentional), it seems like a trick to withhold pertinent information while demanding the work be performed and refusing to pay for it.
Ultimately, the Contractor was entitled to an equitable adjustment to the contract price and time for the backlog.
Agility Defense & Government Services, Inc. v. United States, 847 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
Roads & Bridges | Maximizing Damage Recovery
MAXIMIZING DAMAGE RECOVERY
Tracking Costs, Avoiding Duplication in Liquidated and Actual Damage Claims
A County and Contractor contracted for construction of a road and […]
Roads & Bridges | Roadwork, Delays and Disputes
ROADWORK, DELAYS, AND DISPUTES
The Subcontract Case In Pecos County, Texas
“Road construction is ubiquitous in our society. . . .” C&C Road […]
Roads & Bridges | Understanding Sovereign Immunity
UNDERSTANDING SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY| Public Contracts and Lessons from Recent Texas Cases
Generally, governmental entities are immune from lawsuits. One exception is contractual. If […]
Roads & Bridges | Indiana Court Upholds Broad ND4D Clause
INDIANA COURT UPHOLDS BROAD ND4D CLAUSE | Ruling Precludes Subcontractor Claims for Delay and Acceleration Damages
This is the story of an Indiana […]
Roads & Bridges | Some Conditions Apply
SOME CONDITIONS APPLY | The scope of insurance policy coverage and what the terms dictate
At some time or another, many have tried […]
Roads & Bridges | Contract Termination
CONTRACT TERMINATION | An unpredictable case teaches hard lessons to each party involved
Court decisions are “opinions.” There are majority and dissenting (disagreeing) […]
Roads & Bridges | Good Faith and Fair Dealing
GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING | How Do You Prove a Party Has Failed to Act Based Upon an Ulterior Motive?
The duty […]
Roads & Bridges | Not Another Notice Story
NOT ANOTHER NOTICE STORY| This Defensive Argument Seems to be on the Rise
AS I CONSIDERED the subject matter for this column, I […]
Roads & Bridges | All According to Plan
ALL ACCORDING TO PLAN | Exact Measurements Go a Long Way
In December 2013, a contractor agreed to replace four bridges for the […]









