What’s the difference between a suspension of work and a constructive change? For federal contractors, there are two important differences:
- If you want profit, prove a constructive change.
- If any other contract clause affords an equitable adjustment (e.g., Changes Clause), the Suspension of Work clause won’t help you.
To recover from a suspension of work, a contractor must show:
- Contract performance was delayed;
- Government directly caused the delay;
- The delay was for an unreasonable period of time; and
- The contractor suffered damages therefrom (excluding profit); and
- No other clause provides an equitable adjustment to the Contractor
To prove a constructive change, a contractor must show:
- Any written or oral order from the Contracting Officer;
- Not a directed change;
- That caused a change;
- Contractor gave timely notice that it considered the order as a change; and
- The contractor suffered damages therefrom.
In a recent Civilian Board of Contract Appeals decision, the Board agreed with the contractor in finding an unreasonable delay (179 days) and awarded damages for a suspension of the work. In the same decision, the Board also found a constructive change in the contractor’s favor. The Board did not discuss why the suspension of work clause prevailed when the contractor may have been able to show a constructive change (unless, perhaps, notice of a constructive change was inadequate).
BCPeabody Construction Services, Inc. v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, CBCA No. 5410, March 26, 2018
Roads & Bridges | Not Another Notice Story
NOT ANOTHER NOTICE STORY| This Defensive Argument Seems to be on the Rise
AS I CONSIDERED the subject matter for this column, I […]
Roads & Bridges | All According to Plan
ALL ACCORDING TO PLAN | Exact Measurements Go a Long Way
In December 2013, a contractor agreed to replace four bridges for the […]
Roads & Bridges | Connecting the Dots
CONNECTING THE DOTS | Showing Causation in Contracting Cases is Critical
In this asphalt case, the prime contractor agreed to perform a $13 […]
Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable
Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.
In June 2017, […]
Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions
WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results
You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]
Roads& Bridges | The Agreed Price
THE AGREED PRICE | This case stands as a warning about pay-if-paid clause
History cannot be rewritten and a bad, but legal, […]
Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters
CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity
What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]
Roads & Bridges | Authority Defined
AUTHORITY DEFINED | The Law of Agency is Important to Understand
For any project, this Russian proverb is helpful: Doveryay, no proveryay – […]
Jurisdiction is Power
Not bad power, but the ability of a decision-maker (e.g., court) to decide which side is right (or which is more correct). […]
