As a Government Contractor, when have you agreed to perform a certain way, but later realized that another way is better for everybody? When the Government agrees, expressly or impliedly, to the alternative performance, it waives a credit for the unperformed work.
In a recent example, under a design-build contract, a Government Contractor agreed to construct permanent bridges over irrigation canals in El Paso County, TX. (As an aside, the coldest night of my life was spent in Guadalupe National Park, just east of this project at negative 15 degrees in December.) The Contractor’s original plan included temporary bridges. After contract award, the Contractor successfully and timely performed its work without the temporary bridges. The Army Corps of Engineers knew of the Contractor’s plan and the changes to that plan, but without objection. Nevertheless, the Government sought a credit for unperformed, temporary bridges.
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals held that where the Government agrees to a planned method, but then does not object to a change in that method, the Government waives a credit, if any, for the savings from the change in method.
Read more about this example at ENR.com: Board Backs Contractor In Corps Cost Discovery Dispute
Appeal of American West Construction, LLC, ASBCA No. 61094 (December 19, 2017).
Roads & Bridges | Contract Termination
CONTRACT TERMINATION | An unpredictable case teaches hard lessons to each party involved
Court decisions are “opinions.” There are majority and dissenting (disagreeing) […]
Roads & Bridges | Good Faith and Fair Dealing
GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING | How Do You Prove a Party Has Failed to Act Based Upon an Ulterior Motive?
The duty […]
Roads & Bridges | Not Another Notice Story
NOT ANOTHER NOTICE STORY| This Defensive Argument Seems to be on the Rise
AS I CONSIDERED the subject matter for this column, I […]
Roads & Bridges | All According to Plan
ALL ACCORDING TO PLAN | Exact Measurements Go a Long Way
In December 2013, a contractor agreed to replace four bridges for the […]
Roads & Bridges | Connecting the Dots
CONNECTING THE DOTS | Showing Causation in Contracting Cases is Critical
In this asphalt case, the prime contractor agreed to perform a $13 […]
Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable
Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.
In June 2017, […]
Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions
WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results
You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]
Roads& Bridges | The Agreed Price
THE AGREED PRICE | This case stands as a warning about pay-if-paid clause
History cannot be rewritten and a bad, but legal, […]
Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters
CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity
What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]
