Has your work on a government contract ever been delayed by another contractor? Did you (the prime contractor) have no control over the other contractor or entity? Did the Government promise you the other contractor would not inhibit your work? If yes to all three, consider the following success story of a Contractor’s recovery for delays against the Government caused by a third-party:
The successful Contractor under an IDIQ contract to perform canal excavation and sediment removal for the Department of Agriculture in St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana. Contractor encountered delays due to the continued presence of another contractor under a separate government contract at the same project site.
Key to the recovery was that during pre-bid site visit, the Contractor asked if the third-party’s work would be complete prior to the Contractor starting work. The Government replied, “Yes!” Fortunately for the Contractor, the pre-bid Q&A’s were made a part of the Contract by the Government’s own express direction.
Generally, the Government is not responsible for delays caused by third parties, even other contractors at its own project site, unless the Government affirmatively indicates the site will be ready and available.
The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals found the pre-bid Q&A’s were sufficient to establish a warranty by the Government that the site would be available. The Contractor recovered from the Government for the delays caused by the third-party contractor.
Roads & Bridges | All According to Plan
ALL ACCORDING TO PLAN | Exact Measurements Go a Long Way
In December 2013, a contractor agreed to replace four bridges for the […]
Roads & Bridges | Connecting the Dots
CONNECTING THE DOTS | Showing Causation in Contracting Cases is Critical
In this asphalt case, the prime contractor agreed to perform a $13 […]
Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable
Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.
In June 2017, […]
Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions
WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results
You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]
Roads& Bridges | The Agreed Price
THE AGREED PRICE | This case stands as a warning about pay-if-paid clause
History cannot be rewritten and a bad, but legal, […]
Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters
CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity
What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]
Roads & Bridges | Authority Defined
AUTHORITY DEFINED | The Law of Agency is Important to Understand
For any project, this Russian proverb is helpful: Doveryay, no proveryay – […]
Jurisdiction is Power
Not bad power, but the ability of a decision-maker (e.g., court) to decide which side is right (or which is more correct). […]
Roads & Bridges | Defining Labor
DEFINING LABOR | How the Miller Act continues to shape the industry
In the late 1700s, risks of nonpayment caused a shortage of […]
