WHAT COUNTS AS A CONTRACT DOCUMENT
A recent decision clarifies how attachments and background reports can fall outside the contract

A DOCUMENT for informational purposes only may not support a differing site condition claim and definitions matter. A recent case decided by the Minnesota Court of Appeals offers a cautionary tale for contractors, engineers and municipalities alike. Ames Construction Inc. v. City of Moorhead, Case No. A25-0754, 2026 WL 861199 (March 30, 2026). Continue reading

Published On: June 9, 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

  • An Unpredictable Case Teaches Hard Lessons | Contract Termination

Roads & Bridges | Contract Termination

September 9, 2024|

CONTRACT TERMINATION | An unpredictable case teaches hard lessons to each party involved

Court decisions are “opinions.” There are majority and dissenting (disagreeing) […]

Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages

February 24, 2024|

LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable

Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.

In June 2017, […]

  • Roads & Bridges | Warranty Provisions

Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions

January 25, 2024|

WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results

You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]

Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters

October 17, 2023|

CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity

What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan J. Straw
Best Lawyers® - Jonathan Straw | 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!