A limitations period is too short when it’s unreasonably short.

Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the Maryland District Court upholding a one-year contractual limitations period for arbitration.  Along with a separate contractual waiver any trial in a traditional court setting, the plaintiff was SOL when he didn’t demand arbitration within one year. 

The Court reaffirmed its prior holding from a separate 2007 case that, generally, “limitations periods may be shortened by agreement, so long as the limitations period is not unreasonably short.”  Absent the agreement, the plaintiff had three years to file a lawsuit for breach of contract.

See also: When typical limitations don’t apply.

Read, re-read, review, and thoroughly understand your contracts.  It’s often better to reasonably act and be rejected than not act or be too late.

Bracey v. Lancaster Foods LLC, No. 19-1292 (4th Cir. Dec. 16, 2020)

Published On: January 25, 2021

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages

February 24, 2024|

LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable

Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.

In June 2017, […]

  • Roads & Bridges | Warranty Provisions

Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions

January 25, 2024|

WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results

You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]

Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters

October 17, 2023|

CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity

What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]

  • Sum Certain Blog Post

Jurisdiction is Power

August 27, 2023|

Not bad power, but the ability of a decision-maker (e.g., court) to decide which side is right (or which is more correct). […]

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Jonathan J. Straw
Best Lawyers® - Jonathan Straw | 2026

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!