A limitations period is too short when it’s unreasonably short.

Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the Maryland District Court upholding a one-year contractual limitations period for arbitration.  Along with a separate contractual waiver any trial in a traditional court setting, the plaintiff was SOL when he didn’t demand arbitration within one year. 

The Court reaffirmed its prior holding from a separate 2007 case that, generally, “limitations periods may be shortened by agreement, so long as the limitations period is not unreasonably short.”  Absent the agreement, the plaintiff had three years to file a lawsuit for breach of contract.

See also: When typical limitations don’t apply.

Read, re-read, review, and thoroughly understand your contracts.  It’s often better to reasonably act and be rejected than not act or be too late.

Bracey v. Lancaster Foods LLC, No. 19-1292 (4th Cir. Dec. 16, 2020)

Published On: January 25, 2021

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

  • Sum Certain Blog Post

Jurisdiction is Power

August 27, 2023|

Not bad power, but the ability of a decision-maker (e.g., court) to decide which side is right (or which is more correct). […]

  • Heavy Construction Law | Mediation Melee | Roads & Bridges

Roads & Bridges | Mediation Melee

June 13, 2023|

MEDIATION MELEE| An arbitration case can be costly

Arbitration can be a bridge over troubled waters. In this crossing, the parties argued over […]

  • Written Notice | Roads & Bridges Article | Jon Straw

Roads & Bridges | Written Notice

April 2, 2023|

WRITTEN NOTICE | Beware that strict compliance of the contract might be required.

When an owner replaced a contractor for significant safety violations, […]

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!