Like cars, computers, and appliances, construction projects include warranties too. Similarly, construction project warranties are limited to causes within the contractor’s control for damages to which the Government or owner has not contributed.
To show a breach of construction warranty, the Government must prove:
- Contractor was responsible for the defective materials or workmanship at issue;
- Government provided timely and proper notice to Contractor; and
- Government did not cause or contribute to the defect(s) or damage(s).
On a $137 million contract for renovation of 22-story historic art deco building located in Boston, Massachusetts, the Contractor installed ball valves of a type different than specified. The Government accepted the Contractor’s installation. Thereafter, an IT services provider unrelated to the Contractor inadvertently bumped/opened one of the water valves enough not to be immediately noticed. But, it was enough to slowly cause nearly $1 million-worth of damage to the building.
The Government failed to prove it did not cause or contribute to the damage since its own IT provider (unrelated to the Contractor) had inadvertently opened the valve.
Notably, the specified valve was a type that required a thumbscrew to open, but the installed/accepted valve was a lever type, which is much easier to inadvertently open.
Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. v. General Services Administration, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals, Nos. 2953, 2954, 2955, 3596, 4175, 4377, and 5006 (December 19, 2019).
Roads & Bridges | Not Another Notice Story
NOT ANOTHER NOTICE STORY| This Defensive Argument Seems to be on the Rise
AS I CONSIDERED the subject matter for this column, I […]
Roads & Bridges | All According to Plan
ALL ACCORDING TO PLAN | Exact Measurements Go a Long Way
In December 2013, a contractor agreed to replace four bridges for the […]
Roads & Bridges | Connecting the Dots
CONNECTING THE DOTS | Showing Causation in Contracting Cases is Critical
In this asphalt case, the prime contractor agreed to perform a $13 […]
Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable
Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.
In June 2017, […]
Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions
WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results
You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]
Roads& Bridges | The Agreed Price
THE AGREED PRICE | This case stands as a warning about pay-if-paid clause
History cannot be rewritten and a bad, but legal, […]
Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters
CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity
What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]
Roads & Bridges | Authority Defined
AUTHORITY DEFINED | The Law of Agency is Important to Understand
For any project, this Russian proverb is helpful: Doveryay, no proveryay – […]
Jurisdiction is Power
Not bad power, but the ability of a decision-maker (e.g., court) to decide which side is right (or which is more correct). […]
