We all know what happens when we “ASS-U-ME” something. So, we should all carefully avoid assuming things unnecessarily.
The prime contractor described below recovered its costs by properly not assuming a duty. This required a distinction among duties that:
- must be done;
- should be done; or
- need not be done.
On a project for the Florida Department of Transportation, the Prime Contractor terminated its landscaping subcontractor for default after the obligatory 72-hour cure period passed. The Prime then promptly submitted a performance bond claim to the terminated sub’s surety. The Prime was obligated to and did wait the 15-day “grace period” for the surety to investigate and respond. However, when the surety failed to substantively respond, the Prime properly mitigated its damages by engaging a replacement subcontractor.
Upon completion of the replacement subcontractor’s work, the Prime submitted its recoverable costs to the defaulted sub’s surety. The surety denied payment by arguing the Prime failed to assist with the surety’s investigation of the default. The Court awarded summary judgment to the Prime finding it had no duty to assist with the surety’s investigation absent an express requirement, which was not included in the bond or subcontract.
The Court agreed that the Prime need not help the surety with the heavy lifting of investigating the sub’s termination for default.
FEDERAL CONTRACT TERMINATION OR MODIFICATION
The White House has directed Agency heads to “terminate or modify . . . covered contracts.” With some exceptions, there are […]
Roads & Bridges | Maximizing Damage Recovery
MAXIMIZING DAMAGE RECOVERY
Tracking Costs, Avoiding Duplication in Liquidated and Actual Damage Claims
A County and Contractor contracted for construction of a road and […]
Roads & Bridges | Roadwork, Delays and Disputes
ROADWORK, DELAYS, AND DISPUTES
The Subcontract Case In Pecos County, Texas
“Road construction is ubiquitous in our society. . . .” C&C Road […]
Roads & Bridges | Understanding Sovereign Immunity
UNDERSTANDING SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY| Public Contracts and Lessons from Recent Texas Cases
Generally, governmental entities are immune from lawsuits. One exception is contractual. If […]
Roads & Bridges | Indiana Court Upholds Broad ND4D Clause
INDIANA COURT UPHOLDS BROAD ND4D CLAUSE | Ruling Precludes Subcontractor Claims for Delay and Acceleration Damages
This is the story of an Indiana […]
Roads & Bridges | Some Conditions Apply
SOME CONDITIONS APPLY | The scope of insurance policy coverage and what the terms dictate
At some time or another, many have tried […]
Roads & Bridges | Contract Termination
CONTRACT TERMINATION | An unpredictable case teaches hard lessons to each party involved
Court decisions are “opinions.” There are majority and dissenting (disagreeing) […]
Roads & Bridges | Good Faith and Fair Dealing
GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING | How Do You Prove a Party Has Failed to Act Based Upon an Ulterior Motive?
The duty […]
Roads & Bridges | Not Another Notice Story
NOT ANOTHER NOTICE STORY| This Defensive Argument Seems to be on the Rise
AS I CONSIDERED the subject matter for this column, I […]
