You’ve heard, “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” In this instance, the smoke was concrete dust that damaged a warehouse full of aircraft parts. No fire was necessary.
An Owner of an aircraft parts distribution facility hired a Contractor to install an elevator at Owner’s warehouse in Fredericksburg, Virginia. The installation required an elevator pit to be cut through several inches of existing concrete. The Contractor used jack hammers and concrete saws without water, which created a significant cloud of dust and particles. The dust cloud settled on and damaged the aircraft parts inventory stored nearby.
Owner’s Insurer argued dust and particulates were excluded from coverage under the Pollution Exclusion pertaining to “any solid . . . irritant or contaminant.” Owner argued that dust and particulates were “smoke,” which was covered under the policy regardless of the Pollution Exclusion.
The Court agreed with the Owner that the dust cloud was “smoke” and was covered. The insurance policy did not separately define “smoke.” But, the term was used in more than one instance in the same policy, from which the Owner successfully argued an ambiguity. The ambiguity allowed the Owner to successfully argue that “smoke” included “any visible suspension of particles in a gas, including the concrete [saw]dust.”
When signing your next contract, consider how a third-party may interpret it months or years later.
Roads & Bridges | Connecting the Dots
CONNECTING THE DOTS | Showing Causation in Contracting Cases is Critical
In this asphalt case, the prime contractor agreed to perform a $13 […]
Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable
Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.
In June 2017, […]
Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions
WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results
You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]
Roads& Bridges | The Agreed Price
THE AGREED PRICE | This case stands as a warning about pay-if-paid clause
History cannot be rewritten and a bad, but legal, […]
Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters
CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity
What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]
Roads & Bridges | Authority Defined
AUTHORITY DEFINED | The Law of Agency is Important to Understand
For any project, this Russian proverb is helpful: Doveryay, no proveryay – […]
Jurisdiction is Power
Not bad power, but the ability of a decision-maker (e.g., court) to decide which side is right (or which is more correct). […]
Roads & Bridges | Defining Labor
DEFINING LABOR | How the Miller Act continues to shape the industry
In the late 1700s, risks of nonpayment caused a shortage of […]
Roads & Bridges | Mediation Melee
MEDIATION MELEE| An arbitration case can be costly
Arbitration can be a bridge over troubled waters. In this crossing, the parties argued over […]
