Imagine you’re a Government Contractor under a firm, fixed-price contract and you’ve done nothing wrong. Nevertheless, the Government has decided to unilaterally end its contract with you. Yes, the Government can do this (for almost any reason). No, you cannot get your anticipated profit for unperformed work. You can only recover:
- Costs you actually incurred;
- Profit on the work actually done; and
- Costs of preparing a termination settlement proposal.
Costs actually incurred include preparing to perform (e.g., costs incurred after award and before notice-to-proceed) because “a settlement should compensate the contractor fairly for the work done and preparations made for the terminated portions of the contract…”). FAR 49.201(a); Appeal of Pro-Built Construction Firm, ASBCA No. 59278 (June 1, 2017).
“Cost and accounting data may provide guides, but are not rigid measures, for ascertaining fair compensation.” FAR 49.201(c). But, contract line items (CLINs) regarding price have no meaning in a T4C settlement focused on costs. Appeal of Atlas Sahil Construction Co., ASBCA No. 58951 (November 9, 2017).
If you get a T4C notice, promptly stop incurring further costs and present a reasonable and well-supported termination settlement proposal to the Government.
FEDERAL CONTRACT TERMINATION OR MODIFICATION
The White House has directed Agency heads to “terminate or modify . . . covered contracts.” With some exceptions, there are […]
Roads & Bridges | Maximizing Damage Recovery
MAXIMIZING DAMAGE RECOVERY
Tracking Costs, Avoiding Duplication in Liquidated and Actual Damage Claims
A County and Contractor contracted for construction of a road and […]
Roads & Bridges | Roadwork, Delays and Disputes
ROADWORK, DELAYS, AND DISPUTES
The Subcontract Case In Pecos County, Texas
“Road construction is ubiquitous in our society. . . .” C&C Road […]
Roads & Bridges | Understanding Sovereign Immunity
UNDERSTANDING SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY| Public Contracts and Lessons from Recent Texas Cases
Generally, governmental entities are immune from lawsuits. One exception is contractual. If […]
Roads & Bridges | Indiana Court Upholds Broad ND4D Clause
INDIANA COURT UPHOLDS BROAD ND4D CLAUSE | Ruling Precludes Subcontractor Claims for Delay and Acceleration Damages
This is the story of an Indiana […]
Roads & Bridges | Some Conditions Apply
SOME CONDITIONS APPLY | The scope of insurance policy coverage and what the terms dictate
At some time or another, many have tried […]
Roads & Bridges | Contract Termination
CONTRACT TERMINATION | An unpredictable case teaches hard lessons to each party involved
Court decisions are “opinions.” There are majority and dissenting (disagreeing) […]
Roads & Bridges | Good Faith and Fair Dealing
GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING | How Do You Prove a Party Has Failed to Act Based Upon an Ulterior Motive?
The duty […]
Roads & Bridges | Not Another Notice Story
NOT ANOTHER NOTICE STORY| This Defensive Argument Seems to be on the Rise
AS I CONSIDERED the subject matter for this column, I […]
