Rely at your own risk upon a Contracting Officer’s statements when statutes or contract provisions may conflict.
U.S. President Reagan used the phrase, “Trust, but Verify” from about 1984-1987 in the context of nuclear disarmament. See a short clip here of President Reagan using that phrase with Mikhail Gorbachev by his side.
That same phrase also applies to communication between Owner and Contractor, Government and Contractor, and/or Contractor and Subcontractor. I’m not suggesting rampant lying or fraud by anyone. Nor am I suggesting disbelieving everything heard – doing that could cripple our world. Rather, to preserve your interests, simply be mindful of words, either spoken or written, and actions done. Balance your trust with a dash of constructive skepticism.
For example, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals has denied appeals when Contractors relied upon statements made by Contracting Officers, but the Contractors didn’t verify the accuracy of the statements by reviewing applicable laws or Contract Documents. The Contractors trusted, but failed to verify. Use the few minutes it may take to verify or risk forfeiting recovery.
Appeal of Anaconda Construction Co., ASBCA No. 60905 (June 26, 2017).
Roads & Bridges | Contract Termination
CONTRACT TERMINATION | An unpredictable case teaches hard lessons to each party involved
Court decisions are “opinions.” There are majority and dissenting (disagreeing) […]
Roads & Bridges | Good Faith and Fair Dealing
GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING | How Do You Prove a Party Has Failed to Act Based Upon an Ulterior Motive?
The duty […]
Roads & Bridges | Not Another Notice Story
NOT ANOTHER NOTICE STORY| This Defensive Argument Seems to be on the Rise
AS I CONSIDERED the subject matter for this column, I […]
Roads & Bridges | All According to Plan
ALL ACCORDING TO PLAN | Exact Measurements Go a Long Way
In December 2013, a contractor agreed to replace four bridges for the […]
Roads & Bridges | Connecting the Dots
CONNECTING THE DOTS | Showing Causation in Contracting Cases is Critical
In this asphalt case, the prime contractor agreed to perform a $13 […]
Roads & Bridges | Liquidated Damages
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES | Penalties and What is Unenforceable
Liquidated damages typically flow from delays, but they are not always solidly enforced.
In June 2017, […]
Roads& Bridges | Warranty Provisions
WARRANTY PROVISIONS | Contracts must be interpreted thoroughly to avoid absurd results
You are responsible for things within your control. Be careful if […]
Roads& Bridges | The Agreed Price
THE AGREED PRICE | This case stands as a warning about pay-if-paid clause
History cannot be rewritten and a bad, but legal, […]
Roads& Bridges | Confusing Waters
CONFUSING WATERS | A Supreme Court ruling leaves room for ambiguity
What happens when there may be a “significant nexus” between “adjacent” and/or […]
