Here’s the situation – You’ve done the extra work because you were verbally asked and you strive to do a good job. But now, the Owner or Prime won’t pay because your Contract or Subcontract precludes payment without a written change order.
Even if your agreement can only be modified by a writing, you may still have a good argument to be paid for extra work.
Consider your prior dealings with the Owner or Prime on the current project and on prior projects. Have you ever been paid for extra work without a written change order? If yes, then you could still get paid even though the contract requires a written change order or other written agreement. The more frequently this happens between you and the other party, the better your chances of payment.
The Virginia Supreme Court has held a subcontract clause requiring a written agreement for changes did not pertain to work outside the scope of the original subcontract. Instead, the Subcontractor’s invoices were sufficient written documentation to show subsequent, separate agreements for the extra work. The Subcontractor’s daily reports supported that the Subcontractor actually performed the extra work. Also important is that the subcontract did not include a provision that excluded all other negotiations from the Subcontract (i.e., a merger or integration clause).
Medlin & Son Construction Co. v. The Matthews Group, Inc., No. 160050 (Va. Nov. 23, 2016)
Roads & Bridges | Wait and It’s Waived
WAIT AND IT’S WAIVED
Roads & Bridges | Supreme Court Ruling on Arbitration Delay
Don’t wait to arbitrate! Progressing too far down the litigation […]
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
BIDDING BLUNDER
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
For over 125 years, the vast majority of jurisdictions […]
FEDERAL CONTRACT TERMINATION OR MODIFICATION
The White House has directed Agency heads to “terminate or modify . . . covered contracts.” With some exceptions, there are […]
Roads & Bridges | Maximizing Damage Recovery
MAXIMIZING DAMAGE RECOVERY
Tracking Costs, Avoiding Duplication in Liquidated and Actual Damage Claims
A County and Contractor contracted for construction of a road and […]
Roads & Bridges | Roadwork, Delays and Disputes
ROADWORK, DELAYS, AND DISPUTES
The Subcontract Case In Pecos County, Texas
“Road construction is ubiquitous in our society. . . .” C&C Road […]
Roads & Bridges | Understanding Sovereign Immunity
UNDERSTANDING SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY| Public Contracts and Lessons from Recent Texas Cases
Generally, governmental entities are immune from lawsuits. One exception is contractual. If […]
Roads & Bridges | Indiana Court Upholds Broad ND4D Clause
INDIANA COURT UPHOLDS BROAD ND4D CLAUSE | Ruling Precludes Subcontractor Claims for Delay and Acceleration Damages
This is the story of an Indiana […]
Roads & Bridges | Some Conditions Apply
SOME CONDITIONS APPLY | The scope of insurance policy coverage and what the terms dictate
At some time or another, many have tried […]
Roads & Bridges | Contract Termination
CONTRACT TERMINATION | An unpredictable case teaches hard lessons to each party involved
Court decisions are “opinions.” There are majority and dissenting (disagreeing) […]
