Prime contractors, have you ever submitted a subcontractor’s claim to a public owner? Subcontractors, have you ever wanted to submit a claim against the government, but you had no contract with the government?
Generally, if the prime has or could have at least some liability (even potentially), then the prime can “pass-thru” the sub’s claim against the government.
A pass-thru claim will fail if the prime has severed or extinguished all liability for the claim between itself and its sub. This can be done by language that may already be in the subcontract or by a later agreement of release or settlement.
But, the same subcontract with the right language or a later agreement between the prime and sub (e.g., liquidation agreement) can preserve liability to keep a pass-thru claim alive.
A short success story:
A prime contractor on a project in Slick Rock, Colorado for the U.S. Dept. of Energy agreed to remediate uranium mill tailings. The prime submitted a pass-thru claim by one of its subcontractors against the Government (the Sub’s claim “passed-thru” the Prime to the Government).
The Government’s efforts to dismiss the claim failed because the prime had to pay whatever recovery it got from the Government to the sub. Only when the recovered amount (no matter how small) was paid, by the Government to the prime and then from the prime to the sub, was the prime’s liability extinguished. Until that point, the fire of the claim kept burning.
M.K. Ferguson Co., et al. v. U.S., Ct. Fed. Claims, No. 12-57C (April 14, 2016)
Roads & Bridges |Let the Contract Lead
LET THE CONTRACT LEAD
Documents offer guidance needed to manage risk without derailing projects
Construction is an industry of managed risk. Whether the prices […]
Roads & Bridges | When is an Invoice Really an Invoice?
WHEN IS AN INVOICE REALLY AN INVOICE?
All court decisions are opinions. Appellate court decisions are typically made by a panel of three […]
Roads & Bridges | Clarifying Punitive Damages
CLARIFYING PUNITIVE DAMAGES
In June 2021, the South Dakota Department of Transportation contracted for the demolition and construction of a bridge on State […]
Roads & Bridges | When Approximate Means Assumed Risk
WHEN APPROXIMATE MEANS ASSUMED RISK
A New York Court Shows How Performance Specifications Can Leave Contractors Holding the Bag
Sometimes when we are told […]
Roads & Bridges | From Roman Arches to AI
FROM ROMAN ARCHES TO AI
Can Construction Evolve Without Risk?
The construction industry blends old with new. From ancient Roman archways and aqueducts and […]
Roads & Bridges | Caught in the Middle
CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE
New Mexico bridge case highlights the importance of written agreements for changes and delay compensation
In construction contracting, hope for […]
Roads & Bridges | Wait and It’s Waived
WAIT AND IT’S WAIVED
Roads & Bridges | Supreme Court Ruling on Arbitration Delay
Don’t wait to arbitrate! Progressing too far down the litigation […]
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
BIDDING BLUNDER
Roads & Bridges | Court Defines When Contractors Can Withdraw Due to Mistakes
For over 125 years, the vast majority of jurisdictions […]
FEDERAL CONTRACT TERMINATION OR MODIFICATION
The White House has directed Agency heads to “terminate or modify . . . covered contracts.” With some exceptions, there are […]










