Mediation is often a good idea, but only if it is “ripe.” An unripe mediation can leave a bad taste in your mouth. Have you ever tasted an unripe persimmon? Not only will it drain all the moisture from your mouth, but you may never want to try one again – the tannins of the unripe fruit are very bitter. However, having tasted one ripened to perfection, you will certainly want more. The same is true of most fruit and of your experience with mediation.
Assuming your construction contract includes a mediation provision and you just received a letter from a subcontractor requesting mediation, how should you respond? Since the contract obligates you to mediate, you should agree, right? Yes, but the contract and the request may not account for a pre-mediation exchange of information to ripen the dispute before a mediation session. Mediating without a reasonable understanding of each party’s position and the relative risks and rewards of settlement is like tasting an unripe persimmon – it will drain the good perspective that you had for mediation and you may never want to mediate again.
But how will a pre-mediation exchange of information succeed? After all, the dispute probably arose because the parties couldn’t or wouldn’t work together through normal project procedures? How then can the parties expect to ripen the dispute for mediation?
With time, the gradual exchange of information, a willingness to consider both giving and taking, and maybe the help of a third-party, the parties will understand that resolving the dispute now will likely save time and money later.
Roads & Bridges | Life, Liberty and Contract Claims
LIFE, LIBERTY AND CONTRACT CLAIMS
The Declaration of Independence Doubles as a Familiar Lesson in Construction Contracts
Look to the Declaration of Independence for […]
Jonathan Straw: Editor
CLOSING THE LOOPHOLE: ARIZONA ADDS PROMPT PAY PROTECTIONS TO REVITALIZATION DISTRICTS
Arizona contractors operating in public and quasi-public sectors sometimes rely on Prompt […]
Roads & Bridges | What Counts as a Contract Document
WHAT COUNTS AS A CONTRACT DOCUMENT
A recent decision clarifies how attachments and background reports can fall outside the contract
A DOCUMENT for informational […]
Roads & Bridges | Award Upheld in W. Va. Caisson Dispute
AWARD UPHELD IN W.VA. CAISSON DISPUTE
Federal court reinforces high bar for overturning arbitration
In 2018, the West Virginia Department of Highways (DOH) awarded […]
Roads & Bridges | Let the Contract Lead
LET THE CONTRACT LEAD
Documents offer guidance needed to manage risk without derailing projects
Construction is an industry of managed risk. Whether the prices […]
Roads & Bridges | When is an Invoice Really an Invoice?
WHEN IS AN INVOICE REALLY AN INVOICE?
All court decisions are opinions. Appellate court decisions are typically made by a panel of three […]
Roads & Bridges | Clarifying Punitive Damages
CLARIFYING PUNITIVE DAMAGES
In June 2021, the South Dakota Department of Transportation contracted for the demolition and construction of a bridge on State […]
Roads & Bridges | When Approximate Means Assumed Risk
WHEN APPROXIMATE MEANS ASSUMED RISK
A New York Court Shows How Performance Specifications Can Leave Contractors Holding the Bag
Sometimes when we are told […]
Roads & Bridges | From Roman Arches to AI
FROM ROMAN ARCHES TO AI
Can Construction Evolve Without Risk?
The construction industry blends old with new. From ancient Roman archways and aqueducts and […]
