The Board (and the government) should not elevate form over substance in evaluating the sufficiency of a contractor’s notice.
A contracting officer’s review of certified claims submitted in good faith is not intended to be a negotiating game where the agency may deny meritorious claims to gain leverage over the contractor.
Despite “abhorrent” behavior by the Army Corps of Engineers, a […]
- Government Construction Contracts Require Bonds, Even When Contract Doesn’t Say So GalleryAmbiguity, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), Contract Interpretation, Court of Federal Claims, Government Contract, Terms and Conditions
Yesterday (Nov. 5, 2018), the Fed. Cir. Ct. of Appeals again endorsed the Christian doctrine, which can make unstated requirements part of a government contract.
The Government’s negligent estimate failed to provide the “most current information available.”
Mel Brooks in the movie History of the World: Part I (1981) said it best – “It’s good to be the King.” It’s also true when asserting claims against the State or an arm or agent of the State.
Contractors take heed – a time extension may be issued […]
What’s the Difference Between a Suspension of Work and a Constructive Change? For federal contractors, there are two main differences: . . .